Suppr超能文献

美国和加拿大急诊医学住院医师的气道管理:对6000多次气管插管尝试的多中心分析。

Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts.

作者信息

Sagarin Mark J, Barton Erik D, Chng Yi-Mei, Walls Ron M

机构信息

University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;46(4):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.009.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We determine success rates of endotracheal intubation performed in emergency departments (EDs) by North American emergency medicine residents.

METHODS

During 58 months, physicians performing intubations at 31 university-affiliated EDs in 3 nations completed a data form that was entered into the National Emergency Airway Registry 2 database. Included were all patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in the ED. The data form included patients' age, sex, weight, indication for intubation, technique of airway management, names and dosages of all medications used to facilitate intubation, level of training and specialty of the intubator, number of attempts, success or failure, and adverse events. We queried this prospectively gathered, observational data to analyze intubations done by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents.

RESULTS

Enrollment was incomplete (eg, 85% at the main study center), so the study sample did not include all consecutive patients. Emergency medicine residents performed 77% (5768/7498; 95% confidence interval [CI] 76% to 78%) of all initial intubation attempts in the United States and Canada. The first intubator was successful in 90% (5,193/5,757; 95% CI 89% to 91%) of cases, including 83% (4,775/5,757; 95% CI 82% to 84%) on the first attempt. Success rates on the first attempt were as follows: postgraduate year 1 = 72% (498/692; 95% CI 68% to 75%), postgraduate year 2 = 82% (2,081/2,544; 95% CI 80% to 83%), postgraduate year 3 = 88% (1,963/2,238; 95% CI 86% to 89%), postgraduate year 4+ = 82% (233/283; 95% CI 77% to 87%), and attending physician = 89% (689/772; 95% CI 87% to 91%). Success rates by the first intubator were as follows: postgraduate year 1 = 80% (553/692; 95% CI 77% to 83%), postgraduate year 2 = 89% (2,272/2,544; 95% CI 88% to 90%), postgraduate year 3 = 94% (2,105/2,238; 95% CI 93% to 95%), postgraduate year 4+ = 93% (263/283; 95% CI 89% to 96%), and attending physician = 98% (755/772; 95% CI 96% to 99%). Rapid sequence intubation technique was used in 78% (4,513/5,768; 95% CI 77% to 79%) of initial attempts: it resulted in 85% (3,843/4,513; 95% CI 84% to 86%) success on the first attempt and 91% (4,117/4,513; 95% CI 90% to 92%) success by the first intubator. The overall rate of cricothyrotomy for all emergency resident intubations was 0.9% (50/5,757; 95% CI 0.6% to 1.1%). When an initial intubator failed, 40% (385/954; 95% CI 37% to 44%) of rescue attempts were performed by emergency medicine residents. Among emergency medicine residents, success on the first rescue attempt was 80% (297/371; 95% CI 76% to 84%), and success by the first rescue intubator was 88% (328/371; 95% CI 85% to 91%).

CONCLUSION

Success of initial intubation attempts increased over the first 3 years of residency. This large multicenter study demonstrates the success of airway management by emergency medicine residents in North America. Using rapid-sequence intubation predominantly, emergency medicine residents achieved high levels of success.

摘要

研究目的

我们确定北美急诊医学住院医师在急诊科(ED)进行气管插管的成功率。

方法

在58个月期间,在3个国家的31家大学附属医院急诊科进行插管操作的医生填写了一份数据表格,该表格被录入国家紧急气道注册数据库2。纳入的患者为所有在急诊科接受气管插管的患者。数据表格包括患者的年龄、性别、体重、插管指征、气道管理技术、用于辅助插管的所有药物的名称和剂量、插管者的培训水平和专业、尝试次数、成功或失败以及不良事件。我们查询了这些前瞻性收集的观察性数据,以分析美国和加拿大急诊医学住院医师进行的插管操作。

结果

入组情况不完整(例如,主要研究中心的入组率为85%),因此研究样本未包括所有连续患者。在美国和加拿大,急诊医学住院医师进行了所有首次插管尝试的77%(5768/7498;95%置信区间[CI]76%至78%)。首次插管者在90%(5193/5757;95%CI89%至91%)的病例中成功,其中首次尝试成功的比例为83%(4775/5757;95%CI82%至84%)。首次尝试的成功率如下:研究生一年级=72%(498/692;95%CI68%至75%),研究生二年级=82%(2081/2544;95%CI80%至83%),研究生三年级=88%(1963/2238;95%CI86%至89%),研究生四年级及以上=82%(233/283;95%CI77%至87%),主治医师=89%(689/772;95%CI87%至91%)。首次插管者的成功率如下:研究生一年级=80%(553/692;95%CI77%至83%),研究生二年级=89%(2272/2544;95%CI88%至90%),研究生三年级=94%(2105/2238;95%CI93%至95%),研究生四年级及以上=93%(263/283;95%CI89%至96%),主治医师=98%(755/772;95%CI96%至99%)。78%(4513/5768;95%CI77%至79%)的首次尝试使用了快速顺序插管技术:首次尝试成功率为85%(3843/4513;95%CI84%至86%),首次插管者成功率为91%(4117/4513;95%CI90%至92%)。所有急诊住院医师插管的环甲膜切开术总体发生率为0.9%(50/5757;95%CI0.6%至1.1%)。当首次插管者失败时,40%(385/954;95%CI37%至44%)的救援尝试由急诊医学住院医师进行。在急诊医学住院医师中,首次救援尝试的成功率为80%(297/371;95%CI76%至84%),首次救援插管者的成功率为88%(3,28/371;95%CI85%至91%)。

结论

首次插管尝试的成功率在住院医师培训的前3年有所提高。这项大型多中心研究证明了北美急诊医学住院医师气道管理的成功。主要使用快速顺序插管,急诊医学住院医师取得了较高的成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验