• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂成形术的安全性及并发症:一项批判性分析

Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis.

作者信息

Mandhani Anil, Kumar Devendra, Kumar Anant, Kapoor Rakesh, Dubey Deepak, Srivastava Aneesh, Bhandari Mahendra

机构信息

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2005 Sep;19(7):797-802. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.797.

DOI:10.1089/end.2005.19.797
PMID:16190831
Abstract

PURPOSE

To critically assess the safety profile and complications of the transperitoneal approach to laparoscopic pyeloplasty at our center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2004, 92 patients with a mean age of 22.78 +/- 15.15 years (range 14 months-65 years) with primary (N = 90) or secondary (N = 2) ureteropelvic junction obstruction were treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and were evaluated for this study. Renal stones were present in eight patients. A double-J stent was placed antegrade in 50 patients and in the rest through cystoscopy. All patients were followed up clinically and by renal scan.

RESULTS

Of the 92 cases (93 renal units), 6 were converted to open pyeloplasty. Dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in 59, Fengerplasty in 8, and Foley Y-V-plasty in 20 units. A crossing vessel was present in 15 units (16.12%). The mean estimated blood loss was 63.6 mL (range, 30-200 mL). The mean operative time was 179.4 minutes (range 80-350 minutes). Overall, 17 patients (18.4%) had complications. Six patients had paralytic ileus and another six had increased drain output, which delayed the hospital stay to 7 days. Pyelonephritis and port-site hernia occurred in one patient each. Four patients required ancillary procedures: ureteroscopy for a migrating stent (1), percutaneous antegrade stenting (1), and SWL for residual stone (2). The mean hospital stay was 4 days (range 2-7 days). Of the 87 units (86 patients), 81 (93.3%) have shown improvement in symptoms and drainage pattern on renal scan at a mean followup of 12 (3-27) months.

CONCLUSION

The transperitoneal approach to pyeloplasty is safe and effective, although patients with large stone bulk and multiple stones should be considered for an alternative approach. The double-J stent should be checked carefully for proper placement. Hemostasis of the cut margin of the renal pelvis, watertight anastomosis, and adequate drainage should also be ensured.

摘要

目的

严格评估我院经腹腔途径腹腔镜肾盂成形术的安全性及并发症情况。

患者与方法

2002年1月至2004年1月,92例平均年龄22.78±15.15岁(范围14个月至65岁)的原发性(n = 90)或继发性(n = 2)肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻患者接受了经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂成形术,并纳入本研究进行评估。8例患者存在肾结石。50例患者顺行置入双J支架,其余患者通过膀胱镜置入。所有患者均进行了临床随访及肾脏扫描。

结果

92例(93个肾单位)患者中,6例转为开放性肾盂成形术。59个肾单位进行了离断性肾盂成形术,8个进行了芬格成形术,20个进行了弗利Y-V成形术。15个肾单位(16.12%)存在交叉血管。估计平均失血量为63.6 mL(范围30 - 200 mL)。平均手术时间为179.4分钟(范围80 - 350分钟)。总体而言,17例患者(18.4%)出现并发症。6例患者发生麻痹性肠梗阻,另外6例引流液量增加,导致住院时间延长至7天。肾盂肾炎和切口疝各发生1例。4例患者需要辅助治疗:输尿管镜取出移位支架(1例)、经皮顺行置入支架(1例)、体外冲击波碎石治疗残留结石(2例)。平均住院时间为4天(范围2 - 7天)。87个肾单位(86例患者)中,81个(93.3%)在平均随访12(3 - 27)个月时肾脏扫描显示症状及引流模式有所改善。

结论

经腹腔途径肾盂成形术安全有效,不过结石体积大及多发结石患者应考虑采用其他手术途径。应仔细检查双J支架的放置是否合适。还应确保肾盂切缘止血、吻合口严密以及充分引流。

相似文献

1
Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis.经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂成形术的安全性及并发症:一项批判性分析
J Endourol. 2005 Sep;19(7):797-802. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.797.
2
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗继发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da.
3
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty.
Urol Int. 2009;83(4):420-4. doi: 10.1159/000251182. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
4
Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术的技术改进
J Endourol. 2005 Apr;19(3):393-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.393.
5
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy.腹腔镜肾盂成形术同期肾盂切开取石术
J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1378-80.
6
Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?儿童后腹腔镜与腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术哪种更好?
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.200. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
7
Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.短期可取出输尿管支架在小儿腹腔镜肾盂成形术中的应用价值
J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):720-5; discussion 725. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.017.
8
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with horseshoe kidney.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗马蹄肾患儿。
J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.059. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
9
Concomitant percutaneous nephrolithotomy and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by stones.同期经皮肾镜取石术与经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻合并结石
J Endourol. 2008 Oct;22(10):2251-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.9726.
10
Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site dismembered pyeloplasty: a clinical report of 10 cases.后腹腔镜单孔离断式肾盂成形术的可行性与安全性:附10例临床报告
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Sep;22(7):685-90. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0164. Epub 2012 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study.经腹与腹膜后机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗儿童肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的多中心前瞻性研究
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Jun 15;41:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.009. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的手术及功能结果比较
Turk J Urol. 2014 Mar;40(1):24-30. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.06956.
3
Transmesocolic approach for left side laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison with laterocolic approach in the initial learning period.
经肠系膜途径行左侧腹腔镜肾盂成形术:与结肠旁途径在初始学习阶段的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2013 Jan 1;54(1):197-203. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.197.
4
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the standard of care for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术:输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的治疗标准。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Apr;5(2):136-8. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11036.
5
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: the SGPGI experience.小儿患者的腹腔镜肾盂成形术:SGPGI的经验
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60441.
6
Minimal invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in low volume pelvis: A comparative study of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty.小容量盆腔中输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的微创治疗:内镜肾盂切开术与腹腔镜非离断性肾盂成形术的比较研究
Indian J Urol. 2009 Jan;25(1):68-71. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.45540.
7
Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction.输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的微创手术选择:朝着正确方向迈出的重要一步。
Indian J Urol. 2009 Jan;25(1):27-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.45533.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.100例肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻患者腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):411-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9436-0.
9
Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻手术方法的比较:内镜肾盂成形术与内镜肾盂切开术及腹腔镜肾盂成形术
Curr Urol Rep. 2007 Mar;8(2):140-9. doi: 10.1007/s11934-007-0064-y.