• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

100例肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻患者腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术的比较。

Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.

作者信息

Calvert R C, Morsy M M, Zelhof B, Rhodes M, Burgess N A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):411-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9436-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-007-9436-0
PMID:17593442
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether the morbidity and outcome rates for laparoscopic transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty are different from those for dismembered pyeloplasty, to analyze the learning curve of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and to determine whether preoperative stent placement affects outcome.

METHODS

For this study, 49 laparoscopic pyeloplasties (period 2000-2005) and 51 open pyeloplasties (period 1992-2003) were reviewed.

RESULTS

Compared with open procedures, laparoscopic procedures were associated with a longer mean operating time (159 vs 91 min; p < 0.001), a shorter mean time to normal diet (38 vs 72 h; p < 0.001), and a similar mean hospital stay (5 days; p = 0.6). The operative complication rates were 17% for primary laparoscopic pyeloplasties and 24% for primary open pyeloplasties. The rates were higher for secondary procedures. The success rates for primary and secondary procedures were, respectively, 98% (41/42) and 57% (4/7) for laparoscopy and 96% (46/48) and 67% (2/3) for open surgery. Failed procedures showed no improvement in loin pain or obstruction. At the 6-month follow-up evaluation, 29% of the open surgery patients but none of the laparoscopic surgery patients reported wound pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty is equivalent to that of open pyeloplasty, with less wound pain at 6 months. The outcome for secondary procedures is inferior. There was a trend toward a reduction in complications and the conversion rates with time, suggesting that there may be a learning curve of approximately 30 laparoscopic pyeloplasty cases. Preoperative stent insertion did not seem to affect any objective measures of outcome for laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定腹腔镜经腹膜肾盂成形术的发病率和结局率是否与开放性肾盂成形术不同,分析腹腔镜肾盂成形术的学习曲线,并确定术前放置支架是否会影响结局。

方法

本研究回顾了49例腹腔镜肾盂成形术(2000 - 2005年)和51例开放性肾盂成形术(1992 - 2003年)。

结果

与开放性手术相比,腹腔镜手术的平均手术时间更长(159分钟对91分钟;p < 0.001),恢复正常饮食的平均时间更短(38小时对72小时;p < 0.001),平均住院时间相似(5天;p = 0.6)。初次腹腔镜肾盂成形术的手术并发症发生率为17%,初次开放性肾盂成形术为24%。二次手术的发生率更高。腹腔镜手术初次和二次手术的成功率分别为98%(41/42)和57%(4/7),开放性手术分别为96%(46/48)和67%(2/3)。手术失败的患者腰部疼痛或梗阻无改善。在6个月的随访评估中,29%的开放性手术患者报告有伤口疼痛,而腹腔镜手术患者均未报告。

结论

腹腔镜肾盂成形术的疗效与开放性肾盂成形术相当,6个月时伤口疼痛较轻。二次手术的结局较差。随着时间推移,并发症和中转率有下降趋势,表明腹腔镜肾盂成形术可能存在约30例的学习曲线。术前放置支架似乎不影响腹腔镜肾盂成形术结局的任何客观指标。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.100例肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻患者腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):411-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9436-0.
2
Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.开放手术与腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的疗效比较:附49例报告
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Dec;83(4):169-74.
3
Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.我们对腹膜后和经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的经验。
Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):973-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
4
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术治疗儿童复发性输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻的比较
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):401.e1-401.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?儿童肾盂成形术失败:机器人辅助腹腔镜再次修复是否可行?
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):69.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery.儿童再次手术的腹腔镜肾盂成形术:与开放手术的比较
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1878-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.053.
7
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗继发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da.
8
Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.在最糟糕的情况下进行挽救性腹腔镜肾盂成形术:在开放性修复和内镜挽救均失败之后。
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):808-12. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.808.
9
Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.基于人群的小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻腹腔镜与开放肾盂成形术的比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1141-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12039. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
10
One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study.腹腔镜和机器人辅助肾盂成形术后 1 周与 4 周支架置入的比较:一项前瞻性随机单中心研究结果。
BJU Int. 2014 Jun;113(6):931-5. doi: 10.1111/bju.12652.

引用本文的文献

1
The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: a systematic review.泌尿外科主要腹腔镜和机器人手术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2037-2057. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345.
2
Role of laparoscopy in the era of robotic surgery in urology in developing countries.腹腔镜检查在发展中国家泌尿外科机器人手术时代的作用。
Indian J Urol. 2021 Jan-Mar;37(1):32-41. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_252_20. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Primary Pelvic Ureteric Junction Obstruction: A Prospective Single Centre Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹膜后腹腔镜与开放离断性肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的回顾性比较
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1077-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.073.
2
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard.腹腔镜肾盂成形术:一种新金标准的演进
Urology. 2006 May;67(5):932-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.024. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
3
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
腹腔镜与开放肾盂成形术治疗原发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:一项前瞻性单中心研究
Cureus. 2020 Oct 22;12(10):e11087. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11087.
4
Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - a systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的手术方法 - 系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0544-7.
5
Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients.成人肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助肾盂成形术比较。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):325-329. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00991-6. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty practice patterns in Canada.加拿大腹腔镜肾盂成形术的实践模式
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Sep;13(9):E268-E278. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5675.
7
Laparoscopic single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) pyeloplasty: a description of the first 32 cases.腹腔镜单切口三角脐部手术(SITUS)肾盂成形术:32 例初步报告。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1883-1888. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2308-5. Epub 2018 May 12.
8
Laparoscopic management of primary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Single-centre experience.原发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的腹腔镜治疗:单中心经验
Arab J Urol. 2011 Dec;9(4):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
9
Defining the pros and cons of open, conventional laparoscopy, and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in a developing nation.界定在一个发展中国家开展开放性肾盂成形术、传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术及机器人辅助肾盂成形术的利弊。
Adv Urol. 2014;2014:850156. doi: 10.1155/2014/850156. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
10
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Dismembered Pyeloplasty with or without Ureteral Stenting in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻行离断性肾盂成形术加或不加输尿管支架置入术的手术效果比较
Korean J Urol. 2012 Aug;53(8):564-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.564. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
腹腔镜肾盂成形术与顺行性肾盂内切开术:100例患者的比较及输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻微创治疗的新算法
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.115.
4
Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis.经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂成形术的安全性及并发症:一项批判性分析
J Endourol. 2005 Sep;19(7):797-802. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.797.
5
Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.我们对腹膜后和经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的经验。
Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):973-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
6
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 cases.腹膜后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术:50例经验
Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):514-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.007.
7
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.儿童后腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术的比较
J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1710-3; discussion 1713. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154169.74458.32.
8
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status.腹腔镜肾盂成形术:现状
BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95 Suppl 2:102-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05208.x.
9
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first decade.腹腔镜肾盂成形术:首个十年
BJU Int. 2004 Aug;94(3):264-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04959.x.
10
Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.肾盂内成形术与肾盂切开术及腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗原发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的比较
Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):16-21; discussion 21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.031.