Murray David J, Boulet John R, Kras Joseph F, McAllister John D, Cox Thomas E
Washington University Clinical Simulation Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1127-1134. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000169335.88763.9a.
In an earlier study, trained raters provided reliable scores for a simulation-based anesthesia acute care skill assessment. In this study, we used this acute care skill evaluation to measure the performance of student nurse anesthetists and resident physician trainees. The performance of these trainees was analyzed to provide data about acute care skill acquisition during training. Group comparisons provided information about the validity of the simulated exercises. A set of six simulation-based acute care exercises was used to evaluate 43 anesthesia trainees (28 residents [12 junior and 16 senior] and 15 student nurse anesthetists). Six raters scored the participants on each exercise using either a detailed checklist, key-action items, or a global rating. Trainees with the most education and clinical experience (i.e., senior residents) received higher scores on the simulation scenarios, providing some evidence to support the validity of the multi-scenario assessment. Trainees varied markedly in ability depending on the content of the exercise. In general, anesthesia providers demonstrated similar aptitude in managing each of the six simulated events. Most participants effectively managed ventricular tachycardia, but postoperative events such as anaphylaxis and stroke were more difficult for all trainees to promptly recognize and treat. Training programs could use a simulation-based multiple encounter evaluation to measure provider skill in acute care.
A trainee's skill in managing critical events can be assessed using a multiple scenario simulation-based performance evaluation.
在一项早期研究中,经过培训的评估者为基于模拟的麻醉急性护理技能评估提供了可靠的分数。在本研究中,我们使用这种急性护理技能评估来衡量学生麻醉护士和住院医师培训学员的表现。对这些学员的表现进行分析,以提供有关培训期间急性护理技能习得的数据。组间比较提供了有关模拟练习有效性的信息。使用一组六个基于模拟的急性护理练习来评估43名麻醉学员(28名住院医师[12名初级和16名高级]和15名学生麻醉护士)。六名评估者使用详细清单、关键行动项目或整体评分对每个练习的参与者进行评分。受教育程度和临床经验最丰富的学员(即高级住院医师)在模拟场景中获得了更高的分数,为支持多场景评估的有效性提供了一些证据。学员的能力因练习内容而异。总体而言,麻醉提供者在管理六个模拟事件中的每一个时表现出相似的能力。大多数参与者有效地处理了室性心动过速,但过敏反应和中风等术后事件对所有学员来说都更难迅速识别和治疗。培训项目可以使用基于模拟的多次评估来衡量提供者在急性护理方面的技能。
可以使用基于多场景模拟的绩效评估来评估学员处理危急事件的技能。