Simon R W
Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405.
J Health Soc Behav. 1992 Mar;33(1):25-35.
Although past research indicates that women's higher levels of psychological distress can be accounted for by their greater exposure and vulnerability to role-related stress, the social psychological factors contributing to female vulnerability have not been fully identified. This paper applies identity theory to the phenomenon of gender differences in distress among parents. From an identity perspective, I propose that salience of the parental identity in women's self-conceptions contributes to their vulnerability to parental role strains. Using 1988 survey data from a stratified random sample of married and divorced Indianapolis residents (N = 448), I find that gender differences in distress are explained by differences in exposure to parental role strains. Further analyses reveal, however, that salience of the parental identity contributes to both men's and women's vulnerability to parental role strains. These findings underscore the utility of identity theory for explaining psychological distress among women and men.
尽管过去的研究表明,女性较高的心理困扰程度可归因于她们更多地暴露于与角色相关的压力之下且更为脆弱,但导致女性易受伤害的社会心理因素尚未完全明确。本文将身份理论应用于父母群体中困扰程度的性别差异现象。从身份角度来看,我认为女性自我概念中父母身份的显著性导致她们易受父母角色压力的影响。利用1988年对印第安纳波利斯已婚和离异居民进行分层随机抽样的调查数据(N = 448),我发现困扰程度的性别差异可由接触父母角色压力的差异来解释。然而,进一步的分析表明,父母身份的显著性会导致男性和女性都易受父母角色压力的影响。这些发现强调了身份理论在解释男性和女性心理困扰方面的效用。