Tharyan Prathap
Department of Psychiatry, Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Vellore, India.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;17(2):115-21. doi: 10.1080/09540260500074693.
The Cochrane Collaboration's Schizophrenia Group has, since 1994, been preparing, disseminating and updating high quality systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of interventions for people with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to summarise the Group's methods and its output in terms of effective interventions for people with schizophrenia, and to evaluate this evidence from the perspective of the care of people with schizophrenia in developing countries. This was achieved by a search and narrative synthesis of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's module and database of systematic reviews in Issue 4, 2003 of the Cochrane Library. The results found that the Schizophrenia Group had, by December 2003, published 100 completed reviews, or protocols for reviews, of pharmacological, physical, spiritual, psychosocial interventions and health care delivery pertaining to those with schizophrenia. While evidence of efficacy is present for many of these interventions, evidence of efficiency is less compelling. The reviews in the Cochrane Library provide the currently best available evidence on the value of interventions for people with schizophrenia, but this may not generalize to developing country settings. Pragmatic randomized trials of interventions and evaluations of systems of health care delivery relevant to developing countries are required if the care of those with schizophrenia in these settings is to improve.
自1994年以来,考科蓝协作网精神分裂症研究小组一直在准备、传播和更新关于精神分裂症患者干预措施的高质量随机对照试验系统评价。本研究的目的是总结该小组在精神分裂症患者有效干预措施方面的方法及其成果,并从发展中国家精神分裂症患者护理的角度评估这一证据。这是通过检索考科蓝图书馆2003年第4期考科蓝精神分裂症研究小组的系统评价模块和数据库并进行叙述性综合分析来实现的。结果发现,截至2003年12月,精神分裂症研究小组已发表了100篇关于精神分裂症患者的药物、物理、精神、心理社会干预措施及医疗服务的完整评价或评价方案。虽然其中许多干预措施有疗效证据,但效率证据并不那么令人信服。考科蓝图书馆中的评价提供了目前关于精神分裂症患者干预措施价值的最佳可用证据,但这可能不适用于发展中国家的情况。如果要改善这些环境中精神分裂症患者的护理,就需要进行与发展中国家相关的干预措施实用随机试验和医疗服务系统评价。