Siggeirsdottir Kristin, Olafsson Orn, Jonsson Halldor, Iwarsson Susanne, Gudnason Vilmundur, Jonsson Brynjolfur Y
Icelandic Heart Association.
Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):555-62. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041565.
Because of current cost restrictions, we studied the effect of a shorter hospital stay on function, pain and quality of life (QOL) after total hip replacement (THR).
50 patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team, and a control group (CG) of 23 patients receiving "conventional" rehabilitation often augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center.
Mean hospital stay was shorter for the SG than for the CG (6.4 days and 10 days, respectively; p < 0.001). During the 6-month study period, there were 9 non-fatal complications in the SG and 12 in the CG (p = 0.3). The difference in Oxford Hip Score between the groups was not statistically significant before the operation, but was better for the SG at 2 months (p = 0.03) and this difference remained more or less constant throughout the study. The overall score from the Nottingham Health Profile indicated a better QOL in the SG.
Our preoperative education program, followed by postoperative home-based rehabilitation, appears to be safer and more effective in improving function and QOL after THR than conventional treatment.
由于当前的成本限制,我们研究了缩短住院时间对全髋关节置换术(THR)后功能、疼痛和生活质量(QOL)的影响。
来自两家医院的50名患者被随机分为研究组(SG)和对照组(CG)。研究组有27名患者,接受术前和术后教育计划以及门诊团队的家访;对照组有23名患者,接受通常在康复中心住院强化的“传统”康复治疗。
研究组的平均住院时间比对照组短(分别为6.4天和10天;p<0.001)。在6个月的研究期间,研究组有9例非致命并发症,对照组有12例(p = 0.3)。两组之间术前牛津髋关节评分差异无统计学意义,但在术后2个月时研究组评分更好(p = 0.03),且在整个研究过程中这种差异基本保持不变。诺丁汉健康量表的总体评分表明研究组的生活质量更好。
我们的术前教育计划,随后进行术后居家康复,在改善全髋关节置换术后的功能和生活质量方面似乎比传统治疗更安全、更有效。