Roberts Chris, Lawson Mary, Newble David, Self Ashley, Chan Philip
Office of Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Med Teach. 2005 Sep;27(6):527-33. doi: 10.1080/01421590500136352.
When considering implementing integrated curriculum models, such as problem-based learning (PBL), concerns may be expressed about the need for increased staff resources required to deliver tutor-led small group PBL. Less staff intensive ways of supporting PBL need to be explored. We compared the outcomes of a PBL module conducted in a large class format within a lecture theatre with a module having the same defined learning outcomes delivered in small group PBL format, both supported by e-learning resources. The pre-existing 27 small groups within the whole class (n = 246) of first year students undertaking a cardiovascular basic science module at Sheffield undergraduate medical school, UK, were randomized to 22 groups undertaking the large class Integrated Learning Activity (ILA) and 5 groups to traditional small group facilitated PBL sessions. Outcome measures were: a pre-post knowledge based test, a student educational effectiveness questionnaire, and assessment of student group work and presentations. There seemed to be no significant differences in learning outcomes between the methods although it is recognized that students would prefer the small group teaching format. Within institutions where resources to support small group PBL are limited, the large group ILA format supported with e-learning techniques may be a useful alternative approach.
在考虑实施综合课程模式(如基于问题的学习,PBL)时,人们可能会担心实施导师主导的小组PBL需要增加人员资源。因此,需要探索对人员需求较少的支持PBL的方式。我们比较了在阶梯教室以大班形式开展的PBL模块的结果,以及在电子学习资源支持下,以小组PBL形式开展的具有相同既定学习成果的模块的结果。英国谢菲尔德本科医学院一年级学生的整个班级(n = 246)中,预先存在的27个小组被随机分为22个小组参加大班综合学习活动(ILA),5个小组参加传统的小组辅导PBL课程。结果测量指标包括:基于知识的前后测试、学生教育效果问卷,以及对学生小组作业和展示的评估。尽管大家公认学生更喜欢小组教学形式,但两种方法的学习成果似乎没有显著差异。在支持小组PBL的资源有限的机构中,采用电子学习技术支持的大班ILA形式可能是一种有用的替代方法。