Kelleher Colin T, Hodkinson Trevor R, Douglas Gerry C, Kelly Daniel L
Department of Botany, Trinity College, School of Natural Sciences, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Ann Bot. 2005 Dec;96(7):1237-46. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci275. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
Populations of oak (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) were investigated using morphological and molecular (AFLP) analyses to assess species distinction. The study aimed to describe species distinction in Irish oak populations and to situate this in a European context.
Populations were sampled from across the range of the island of Ireland. Leaf morphological characters were analysed through clustering and ordination methods. Putative neutral molecular markers (AFLPs) were used to analyse the molecular variation. Cluster and ordination analyses were also performed on the AFLP markers in addition to calculations of genetic diversity and F-statisitcs.
A notable divergence was uncovered between the morphological and molecular analyses. The morphological analysis clearly differentiated individuals into their respective species, whereas the molecular analysis did not. Twenty species-specific AFLP markers were observed from 123 plants in 24 populations but none of these was species-diagnostic. Principal Coordinate Analysis of the AFLP data revealed a clustering, across the first two axes, of individuals according to population rather than according to species. High F(ST) values calculated from AFLP markers also indicated population differentiation (F(ST) = 0.271). Species differentiation accounted for only 13 % of the variation in diversity compared with population differentiation, which accounted for 27 %.
The results show that neutral molecular variation is partitioned more strongly between populations than between species. Although this could indicate that the populations of Q. petraea and Q. robur studied may not be distinct species at a molecular level, it is proposed that the difficulty in distinguishing the species in Irish oak populations using AFLP markers is due to population differentiation masking species differences. This could result from non-random mating in small, fragmented woodland populations. Hybridization and introgression between the species could also have a significant role.
利用形态学和分子(AFLP)分析方法对栎属(岩生栎和欧洲栓皮栎)种群进行研究,以评估物种差异。本研究旨在描述爱尔兰栎种群的物种差异,并将其置于欧洲背景下进行考量。
从爱尔兰岛的整个分布范围内采集种群样本。通过聚类和排序方法分析叶片形态特征。使用假定的中性分子标记(AFLP)分析分子变异。除了计算遗传多样性和F统计量外,还对AFLP标记进行了聚类和排序分析。
形态学分析与分子分析之间发现了显著差异。形态学分析能够清晰地将个体区分到各自所属的物种,而分子分析则不能。从24个种群的123株植物中观察到20个物种特异性AFLP标记,但这些标记均无法用于诊断物种。对AFLP数据进行的主坐标分析显示,在前两个轴上,个体是根据种群而非物种进行聚类的。根据AFLP标记计算出的高F(ST)值也表明了种群分化(F(ST) = 0.271)。与占变异27%的种群分化相比,物种分化仅占多样性变异的13%。
结果表明,中性分子变异在种群之间的分配比在物种之间更为强烈。虽然这可能表明所研究的岩生栎和欧洲栓皮栎种群在分子水平上可能并非不同的物种,但有人提出,使用AFLP标记难以区分爱尔兰栎种群中的物种,是由于种群分化掩盖了物种差异。这可能是由于小型、碎片化林地种群中的非随机交配导致的。物种之间的杂交和渐渗也可能起到了重要作用。