Amin Shreyasee, LaValley Michael P, Guermazi Ali, Grigoryan Mikayel, Hunter David J, Clancy Margaret, Niu Jingbo, Gale Daniel R, Felson David T
Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct;52(10):3152-9. doi: 10.1002/art.21296.
To determine the relationship between radiographic progression of joint space narrowing and cartilage loss on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to investigate the location of MRI-based cartilage loss in the knee and its relation to radiographic progression.
Two hundred twenty-four men and women (mean age 66 years) were studied. Radiographs and MRI of the more symptomatic knee were obtained at baseline and at 15- and 30-month followup. Radiographs of the knee (with weight-bearing) were read for joint space narrowing (scale 0-3), with progression defined as any worsening in score. We used a semiquantitative method to score cartilage morphology in all 5 regions of the tibiofemoral joint, and defined cartilage loss as an increase in score (scale 0-4) at any region. We examined the relationship between progression of joint space narrowing on radiographic images and cartilage loss on MRI, using a generalized estimating equation proportional odds logistic regression, adjusted for baseline cartilage score, age, body mass index, and sex. The medial and lateral compartments were analyzed separately.
In the medial compartment, 104 knees (46%) had cartilage loss detected by MRI. The adjusted odds ratio was 3.7 (95% confidence interval 2.2-6.3) for radiographic progression being predictive of cartilage loss on MRI. However, there was still a substantial proportion of knees (80 of 189 [42%]) with cartilage loss visible on MRI when no radiographic progression was apparent. Cartilage loss occurred frequently in the central regions of the femur and tibia as well as the posterior femur region, but radiographic progression was less likely to be observed when posterior femur regions showed cartilage loss. Radiographic progression appeared specific (91%) but not sensitive (23%) for cartilage loss. Overall findings were similar for the lateral compartment.
While our results provide longitudinal evidence that radiographic progression of joint space narrowing is predictive of cartilage loss assessed on MRI, radiography is not a sensitive measure, and if used alone, will miss a substantial proportion of knees with cartilage loss.
确定有症状的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者关节间隙变窄的影像学进展与磁共振成像(MRI)检测到的软骨损伤之间的关系,并研究基于MRI的膝关节软骨损伤位置及其与影像学进展的关系。
对224名男性和女性(平均年龄66岁)进行研究。在基线以及15个月和30个月随访时获取症状较重膝关节的X线片和MRI。对负重膝关节X线片进行关节间隙变窄程度(0 - 3级)的判读,进展定义为评分的任何恶化。我们采用半定量方法对胫股关节的所有5个区域的软骨形态进行评分,并将软骨损伤定义为任何区域评分(0 - 4级)的增加。我们使用广义估计方程比例优势逻辑回归分析X线片上关节间隙变窄进展与MRI上软骨损伤之间的关系,并对基线软骨评分、年龄、体重指数和性别进行校正。分别对内侧和外侧间室进行分析。
在内侧间室,104个膝关节(46%)通过MRI检测到软骨损伤。影像学进展预测MRI上软骨损伤的校正优势比为3.7(95%置信区间2.2 - 6.3)。然而,在无明显影像学进展时,仍有相当比例的膝关节(189个中的80个[42%])在MRI上可见软骨损伤。软骨损伤频繁发生于股骨和胫骨的中央区域以及股骨后侧区域,但当股骨后侧区域出现软骨损伤时,影像学进展的可能性较小。影像学进展对软骨损伤表现出特异性(91%)但不敏感(23%)。外侧间室的总体结果相似。
虽然我们的结果提供了纵向证据,表明关节间隙变窄的影像学进展可预测MRI评估的软骨损伤,但X线检查并非敏感指标,若单独使用,会遗漏相当比例存在软骨损伤的膝关节。