Russo Mary J, Firestone Lisa B, Mandler Raul N, Kelly John J
Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2005 Sep;45(3):180-5.
The diagnosis of meralgia paresthetica, while based on clinical suspicion, can be confirmed via electrophysiological testing. Previous testing of the sensory conduction of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve placed the stimulating electrode one centimeter medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). This position is both uncomfortable for the patient and difficult for the operator to perform. The following article suggests an alternate position for the stimulating electrode, four centimeters distal to the ASIS. Twenty subjects served as their own controls and both the old technique and the new technique were performed. Using the old technique, the response rate was 35% (7 out of 20 subjects). Using the new technique, the response rate was 90% (18 out of 20 subjects). These results indicate a significantly higher response rate when the only variable altered is the electrode placement. This simple change in technique requires no more effort, cost, or training on the part of the operator yet produces a much higher percentage of responses.
股外侧皮神经痛的诊断虽然基于临床怀疑,但可通过电生理测试来确诊。以往对股外侧皮神经感觉传导的测试将刺激电极置于髂前上棘(ASIS)内侧1厘米处。这个位置对患者来说既不舒服,操作者操作起来也困难。以下文章提出了刺激电极的另一个位置,即位于ASIS远端4厘米处。20名受试者作为自身对照,分别采用旧技术和新技术进行测试。采用旧技术时,反应率为35%(20名受试者中有7名)。采用新技术时,反应率为90%(20名受试者中有18名)。这些结果表明,当唯一改变的变量是电极位置时,反应率显著更高。这种技术上的简单改变对操作者来说不需要更多的努力、成本或培训,却能产生高得多的反应百分比。