Suppr超能文献

两种远中游离端可摘局部义齿设计对牙齿稳固性和牙周健康影响的评估。

An evaluation of the effects of two distal extension removable partial denture designs on tooth stabilization and periodontal health.

作者信息

Akaltan F, Kaynak D

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ankara, Beşevler 06500, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Nov;32(11):823-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01511.x.

Abstract

A 30-month follow-up study was conducted on 36 patients to evaluate the effects of the lingual plate as a major connector in distally extended removable partial dentures (RPDs) on tooth stabilization. At the same time, the study evaluated the effects of lingual plate-type RPDs and lingual bar-type RPDs on periodontal health. The most striking finding of the study was that, with the exception of gingival recession (GR), periodontal conditions improved with both types of RPDs. At the end of 30 months, there were significant differences in plaque index, GR and tooth mobility (TM) values between treatment groups (P < 0.05). Plaque accumulation was greater in the lingual plate treatment group; however, this did not result in periodontal breakdown. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups with respect to pocket depth, gingival index or attachment loss (P > 0.05). Moreover, patients treated with lingual plate-type RPDs demonstrated less TM when compared with patients treated with lingual bar-type RPDs at the end of 30 months follow-up. Overall study findings established that with adequate checks on oral and denture hygiene at regular intervals, patients with RPDs may even experience improved periodontal health. Moreover, the clinical interpretation of decreased TM observed in patients treated with lingual plate-type RPDs may be questionable as the plaque accumulation was greater in the lingual plate treatment group inspite of periodic recalls.

摘要

对36例患者进行了为期30个月的随访研究,以评估舌板作为远中延伸可摘局部义齿(RPD)的主要连接体对牙齿稳定的影响。同时,该研究评估了舌板型RPD和舌杆型RPD对牙周健康的影响。该研究最显著的发现是,除牙龈退缩(GR)外,两种类型的RPD均使牙周状况得到改善。在30个月结束时,各治疗组之间的菌斑指数、GR和牙齿松动度(TM)值存在显著差异(P<0.05)。舌板治疗组的菌斑积聚更多;然而,这并未导致牙周破坏。各治疗组在牙周袋深度、牙龈指数或附着丧失方面无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,在30个月随访结束时,与接受舌杆型RPD治疗的患者相比,接受舌板型RPD治疗的患者TM更小。总体研究结果表明,通过定期对口腔和义齿卫生进行适当检查,RPD患者甚至可能经历牙周健康改善。此外,尽管定期复诊,但舌板治疗组的菌斑积聚更多,因此对接受舌板型RPD治疗的患者TM降低的临床解释可能存在疑问。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验