Suppr超能文献

可摘局部义齿对基牙和非基牙牙周健康的影响。

The influence of removable partial dentures on the periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth.

作者信息

Dula Linda J, Shala Kujtim Sh, Pustina-Krasniqi Teuta, Bicaj Teuta, Ahmedi Enis F

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Prishtina, Kosovo.

Department of Prosthetic and Parodontology, MedUni Graz, Dental School, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):382-386. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.163234.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of removable partial dentures (RPD) on the periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total 107 patients with RPD participated in this study. It was examined 138 RPD, they were 87 with clasp-retained and 51 were RPD with attachments. The following periodontal parameters were evaluated for abutment and non-abutment teeth, plaque index (PLI), calculus index (CI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD) (mm) and tooth mobility (TM) index. These clinical measurements were taken immediately before insertion the RPD, then one and 3 months after insertion. The level of significance was set at (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean scores for PLI, CI, BOP, PD, and TM index, of the abutment teeth and non-abutment teeth were no statistically significant at the time of insertion of RPD. After 1-month, PLI was statistically significant (0.57 ± 0.55 for abutment and 0.30 ± 0.46 for non-abutment teeth). After 3 months, there were significant differences between abutment and non-abutment teeth with regard to the BOP (1.53 ± 0.50 and 1.76 ± 0.43 respectively), PD (0.28 ± 0.45 and 0.12 ± 0.33 respectively) and PLI (1.20 ± 0.46 and 0.75 ± 0.64 respectively). No significant mean difference in TM and CI was found between the abutment and non-abutment teeth (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

With carefully planned prosthetic treatment and adequate maintenance of the oral and denture hygiene, we can prevent the periodontal diseases.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估可摘局部义齿(RPD)对基牙和非基牙牙周健康的影响。

材料与方法

共有107例佩戴RPD的患者参与本研究。共检查了138副RPD,其中87副为卡环固位式,51副为附着体式RPD。对基牙和非基牙评估以下牙周参数:菌斑指数(PLI)、牙石指数(CI)、探诊出血(BOP)、探诊深度(PD,单位为毫米)和牙齿松动度(TM)指数。这些临床测量在RPD戴入前即刻进行,然后在戴入后1个月和3个月进行。显著性水平设定为(P < 0.05)。

结果

在RPD戴入时,基牙和非基牙的PLI、CI、BOP、PD和TM指数的平均得分无统计学意义。1个月后,PLI有统计学意义(基牙为0.57±0.55,非基牙为0.30±0.46)。3个月后,基牙和非基牙在BOP(分别为1.53±0.50和1.76±0.43)、PD(分别为0.28±0.45和0.12±0.33)和PLI(分别为1.20±0.46和0.75±0.64)方面存在显著差异。基牙和非基牙之间在TM和CI方面未发现显著的平均差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

通过精心规划的修复治疗以及充分保持口腔和义齿卫生,我们可以预防牙周疾病。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验