Dula Linda J, Shala Kujtim Sh, Pustina-Krasniqi Teuta, Bicaj Teuta, Ahmedi Enis F
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Prishtina, Kosovo.
Department of Prosthetic and Parodontology, MedUni Graz, Dental School, Graz, Austria.
Eur J Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):382-386. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.163234.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of removable partial dentures (RPD) on the periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth.
A total 107 patients with RPD participated in this study. It was examined 138 RPD, they were 87 with clasp-retained and 51 were RPD with attachments. The following periodontal parameters were evaluated for abutment and non-abutment teeth, plaque index (PLI), calculus index (CI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD) (mm) and tooth mobility (TM) index. These clinical measurements were taken immediately before insertion the RPD, then one and 3 months after insertion. The level of significance was set at (P < 0.05).
The mean scores for PLI, CI, BOP, PD, and TM index, of the abutment teeth and non-abutment teeth were no statistically significant at the time of insertion of RPD. After 1-month, PLI was statistically significant (0.57 ± 0.55 for abutment and 0.30 ± 0.46 for non-abutment teeth). After 3 months, there were significant differences between abutment and non-abutment teeth with regard to the BOP (1.53 ± 0.50 and 1.76 ± 0.43 respectively), PD (0.28 ± 0.45 and 0.12 ± 0.33 respectively) and PLI (1.20 ± 0.46 and 0.75 ± 0.64 respectively). No significant mean difference in TM and CI was found between the abutment and non-abutment teeth (P > 0.05).
With carefully planned prosthetic treatment and adequate maintenance of the oral and denture hygiene, we can prevent the periodontal diseases.
本研究旨在评估可摘局部义齿(RPD)对基牙和非基牙牙周健康的影响。
共有107例佩戴RPD的患者参与本研究。共检查了138副RPD,其中87副为卡环固位式,51副为附着体式RPD。对基牙和非基牙评估以下牙周参数:菌斑指数(PLI)、牙石指数(CI)、探诊出血(BOP)、探诊深度(PD,单位为毫米)和牙齿松动度(TM)指数。这些临床测量在RPD戴入前即刻进行,然后在戴入后1个月和3个月进行。显著性水平设定为(P < 0.05)。
在RPD戴入时,基牙和非基牙的PLI、CI、BOP、PD和TM指数的平均得分无统计学意义。1个月后,PLI有统计学意义(基牙为0.57±0.55,非基牙为0.30±0.46)。3个月后,基牙和非基牙在BOP(分别为1.53±0.50和1.76±0.43)、PD(分别为0.28±0.45和0.12±0.33)和PLI(分别为1.20±0.46和0.75±0.64)方面存在显著差异。基牙和非基牙之间在TM和CI方面未发现显著的平均差异(P > 0.05)。
通过精心规划的修复治疗以及充分保持口腔和义齿卫生,我们可以预防牙周疾病。