Anderson Richard C E, Kan Peter, Klimo Paul, Brockmeyer Douglas L, Walker Marion L, Kestle John R W
Primary Children's Medical Center, University of Utah, Department of Neurosurgery, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2004 Aug;101(1 Suppl):53-8. doi: 10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0053.
Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has become routine in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Many surgeons prefer to use external ventricular drains (EVDs) over fiberoptic monitors to measure ICP because of the added benefit of cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The purpose of this study was to examine a consecutive series of children with TBI and compare the incidence of complications after placement of an EVD, a fiberoptic intraparencyhmal monitor, or both.
A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify children with TBI who met the criteria for insertion of an ICP monitor. All patients underwent head CT scanning on admission and after placement of an ICP monitor. During a 5-year period 80 children met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Eighteen children (22.5%) underwent EVD placement only, 18 (22.5%) underwent placement of a fiberoptic device only, and 44 (55%) received both. A total of 62 fiberoptic devices (48%) were inserted, and 68 EVDs (52%) were placed. Overall, there was a fourfold increased risk of complications in children who received an EVD compared with those in whom a fiberoptic monitor was placed (p = 0.004). Hemorrhagic complications were detected in 12 (17.6%) of 62 patients who received an EVD compared with four (6.5%) of 62 patients who received a fiberoptic monitor (p = 0.025). Six (8.8%) of 68 EVDs were malpositioned and required replacement; in three (50%) of these cases a hemorrhagic complication occurred. Only one infection was noted in a patient with an EVD (1.5%).
In this retrospective cohort of pediatric patients with TBI, complication rates were significantly higher in those receiving EVDs than in those in whom fiberoptic monitors were placed. Although the majority of these complications did not entail clinical sequelae, surgeons should be aware of the different complication rates when choosing the most appropriate device for each patient.
颅内压(ICP)监测已成为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者治疗中的常规操作。由于脑脊液引流的额外益处,许多外科医生在测量ICP时更倾向于使用外部脑室引流管(EVD)而非光纤监测仪。本研究的目的是检查一系列连续的TBI儿童患者,并比较放置EVD、光纤脑实质内监测仪或两者后并发症的发生率。
进行回顾性病历审查,以确定符合ICP监测仪插入标准的TBI儿童患者。所有患者入院时及放置ICP监测仪后均接受头部CT扫描。在5年期间,80名儿童符合纳入研究的标准。18名儿童(22.5%)仅接受了EVD放置,18名(22.5%)仅接受了光纤设备放置,44名(55%)同时接受了两者。总共插入了62个光纤设备(48%),放置了68根EVD(52%)。总体而言,与放置光纤监测仪的儿童相比,接受EVD的儿童并发症风险增加了四倍(p = 0.004)。在接受EVD的62名患者中有12名(17.6%)检测到出血性并发症,而在接受光纤监测仪的62名患者中有4名(6.5%)(p = 0.025)。68根EVD中有6根(8.8%)位置不当需要更换;其中3例(50%)发生了出血性并发症。仅1例接受EVD的患者发生感染(1.5%)。
在这个回顾性队列的小儿TBI患者中,接受EVD的患者并发症发生率明显高于放置光纤监测仪的患者。尽管这些并发症大多数没有导致临床后遗症,但外科医生在为每个患者选择最合适的设备时应了解不同的并发症发生率。