Harris Caleb H, Smith R Stephen, Helmer Stephen D, Gorecki John P, Rody R Brent
Department of Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita 67214, USA.
Am Surg. 2002 Sep;68(9):787-90.
Maintaining adequate cerebral perfusion is important in the treatment of patients with closed head injury. Placement of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is necessary to determine both ICP and the cerebral perfusion pressure and serves as a guide to the contemporary management of traumatic brain injury. Insertion of such monitoring devices historically has been performed by neurosurgeons, but others including general (trauma) surgeons have successfully inserted simple ICP monitors. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ICP monitor placement and to compare the complication rates for ICP monitor placement by general surgery residents, trauma surgeons, and staff neurosurgeons. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of trauma patients with cerebral injury who required insertion of parenchymal ICP monitors from January 1994 to January 1999. Monitor placement was performed by staff neurosurgeons, general surgical residents, and trauma surgeons. Surgical residents received appropriate training in the placement of ICP monitors from attending trauma surgeons and neurosurgeons. Records were examined for demographic variables such as age, gender, mechanism of injury, admission Glasgow Coma Score, and Injury Severity Score. Records were also reviewed for duration of ICP monitoring and for complications (i.e., intracranial hemorrhage after monitor placement, monitor-related infection, monitor malfunction, and monitor displacement). One hundred fifty-seven monitors were placed in 146 patients with intracranial injury. Surgical residents placed 87 ICP monitors without neurosurgical or trauma attending surgeons at the bedside and 43 with immediate supervision by general surgeons or neurosurgeons. Neurosurgeons placed 26 monitors without the participation of residents, and an attending trauma surgeon placed one monitor without the involvement of a resident or a neurosurgeon. There were no major technical complications, no episodes of catheter-induced intracranial hemorrhage, and no infectious complications. These data suggest that simple ICP monitors may be inserted by non-neurosurgeons without significant problems or complications. The low complication rate associated with this procedure was similar for neurosurgeons and non-neurosurgeons. We believe that insertion of simple parenchymal ICP monitors should be considered a core skill for trauma surgeons and should be included in surgical residency training. Insertion of ICP monitors by non-neurosurgeons is a potential method of improving the care of patients with brain injury in geographic areas that are underserved by neurosurgeons.
维持充足的脑灌注对闭合性颅脑损伤患者的治疗至关重要。放置颅内压(ICP)监测器对于确定颅内压和脑灌注压均很必要,并且可作为当代创伤性脑损伤管理的指导。历史上,此类监测设备的插入一直由神经外科医生进行,但包括普通(创伤)外科医生在内的其他人员也成功插入过简易ICP监测器。本研究的目的是评估ICP监测器放置的有效性,并比较普通外科住院医师、创伤外科医生和神经外科工作人员放置ICP监测器的并发症发生率。我们回顾性分析了1994年1月至1999年1月期间需要插入实质内ICP监测器的脑损伤创伤患者的病历。监测器放置由神经外科工作人员、普通外科住院医师和创伤外科医生进行。外科住院医师接受了来自主治创伤外科医生和神经外科医生的关于ICP监测器放置的适当培训。检查记录中的人口统计学变量,如年龄、性别、损伤机制、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分和损伤严重程度评分。还审查记录中的ICP监测持续时间和并发症(即监测器放置后颅内出血、监测器相关感染、监测器故障和监测器移位)。146例颅内损伤患者共放置了157个监测器。外科住院医师在没有神经外科或创伤主治医生床边指导的情况下放置了87个ICP监测器,在普通外科医生或神经外科医生即时监督下放置了43个。神经外科医生在没有住院医师参与的情况下放置了26个监测器,一名主治创伤外科医生在没有住院医师或神经外科医生参与的情况下放置了一个监测器。没有重大技术并发症,没有导管引起的颅内出血事件,也没有感染并发症。这些数据表明,非神经外科医生可以插入简易ICP监测器,且不会出现重大问题或并发症。神经外科医生和非神经外科医生进行该操作的低并发症发生率相似。我们认为,插入简易实质内ICP监测器应被视为创伤外科医生的一项核心技能,并应纳入外科住院医师培训。在神经外科医生服务不足的地区,由非神经外科医生插入ICP监测器是改善脑损伤患者护理的一种潜在方法。