Monroe Eugene
Department of Dermatology, Advanced Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209-4590, USA.
Cutis. 2005 Aug;76(2):118-26.
Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) can have a profound effect on patient quality of life (QOL). Ideally, any therapy used to treat CIU should be effective across a wide range of doses without causing unwanted side effects; a wide therapeutic window allows the physician to tailor treatment to the individual. Oral H1 antihistamines are the mainstay of therapy for CIU, but agents within this class diverge in their individual therapeutic indices. The literature was reviewed to compare the currently available oral H1 antihistamines regarding their efficacy and safety at a wide range of doses. If sedation and cognitive impairment are considered relevant to treatment selection due to their effect on QOL and safety, then newer-generation agents should be selected over older-generation antihistamines. There are few well-controlled clinical studies in which newer-generation agents have been directly compared. Moreover, there are no evidence-based data demonstrating statistical superiority of one newer-generation agent over another in the treatment of CIU. However, of the newer agents, those that are labelled nonsedating at recommended doses (fexofenadine, loratadine, and desloratadine) should be selected over cetirizine. In cases where the physician judges that a higher-than-recommended dose should be prescribed, or when the patient is likely to take a higher dose, the relative safety profile of these agents demands detailed consideration.
慢性特发性荨麻疹(CIU)会对患者的生活质量(QOL)产生深远影响。理想情况下,用于治疗CIU的任何疗法都应在广泛的剂量范围内有效且不会引起不良副作用;较宽的治疗窗使医生能够根据个体情况调整治疗方案。口服H1抗组胺药是CIU治疗的主要药物,但该类药物的个体治疗指数存在差异。本文回顾了相关文献,以比较目前可用的口服H1抗组胺药在广泛剂量范围内的疗效和安全性。如果镇静和认知障碍因其对生活质量和安全性的影响而被认为与治疗选择相关,那么应选择新一代药物而非老一代抗组胺药。很少有对照良好的临床研究直接比较新一代药物。此外,没有基于证据的数据表明在治疗CIU时一种新一代药物比另一种具有统计学上的优越性。然而,在新一代药物中,应选择那些在推荐剂量下标明无镇静作用的药物(非索非那定、氯雷他定和地氯雷他定)而非西替利嗪。在医生判断应开具高于推荐剂量的处方时,或者当患者可能服用更高剂量时,这些药物的相对安全性需要详细考虑。