• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用“自己动手”耳部真空套件和乔布森-霍恩探针清除耳垢的非随机比较。

A non-randomized comparison of earwax removal with a 'do-it-yourself' ear vacuum kit and a Jobson-Horne probe.

作者信息

Leong A C, Aldren C

机构信息

Department of ENT, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Aug;30(4):320-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01020.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01020.x
PMID:16209672
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Do-it-yourself ear vacuum kits (ear vacs) have recently been introduced as an effective method of earwax removal. This study assesses the efficacy of ear vacs in comparison with a conventional mechanical method of earwax removal, the Jobson-Horne probe.

METHODS

Forty healthy relatives who had accompanied family members to orthopaedic and haematology clinics were screened with otoscopy. Sixteen participants with earwax were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(i) Weight of earwax removed, (ii) proportion of tympanic membrane visible before and after each intervention, (iii) participants' subjective assessment of any improvement in hearing. Suction pressure generated by the ear vac was also compared with that of microsuctioning.

RESULTS

No earwax was removed with the ear vac but the Jobson-Horne probe was significantly more effective at removing a greater weight of earwax (P < 0.001, mean weight 92.4 mg). There was no improvement in visibility of the tympanic membrane after the ear vac but the Jobson-Horne probe restored visibility to 100% (P < 0.001). No participant felt that there was an improvement in their hearing after the ear vac, but the majority (88%) reported an improvement in their hearing after the Jobson-Horne probe.

CONCLUSION

A Jobson-Horne probe is significantly more effective than an ear vac for the removal of earwax.

摘要

目的

自行使用的耳部真空套件(耳用真空装置)最近被作为一种有效的耵聍清除方法引入。本研究评估耳用真空装置与传统的机械耵聍清除方法(乔布森 - 霍恩探针)相比的疗效。

方法

对40名陪同家庭成员前往骨科和血液科诊所就诊的健康亲属进行耳镜检查筛选。选取了16名有耵聍的参与者。

主要观察指标

(i)清除的耵聍重量,(ii)每次干预前后鼓膜可见比例,(iii)参与者对听力改善的主观评估。还比较了耳用真空装置产生的吸力与微型吸引器产生的吸力。

结果

耳用真空装置未清除任何耵聍,但乔布森 - 霍恩探针在清除更多重量的耵聍方面明显更有效(P < 0.001,平均重量92.4毫克)。耳用真空装置使用后鼓膜可见度没有改善,但乔布森 - 霍恩探针使鼓膜可见度恢复到100%(P < 0.001)。耳用真空装置使用后没有参与者感觉听力有所改善,但大多数(88%)参与者报告在使用乔布森 - 霍恩探针后听力有所改善。

结论

乔布森 - 霍恩探针在清除耵聍方面比耳用真空装置明显更有效。

相似文献

1
A non-randomized comparison of earwax removal with a 'do-it-yourself' ear vacuum kit and a Jobson-Horne probe.使用“自己动手”耳部真空套件和乔布森-霍恩探针清除耳垢的非随机比较。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Aug;30(4):320-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01020.x.
2
A quasi-randomised controlled trial of water as a quick softening agent of persistent earwax in general practice.在全科医疗中,将水作为持续性耵聍快速软化剂的一项半随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Aug;51(469):635-7.
3
Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of Cerumenex and Murine earwax removal products.对Cerumenex和Murine耳部除垢产品进行的随机、安慰剂对照评估。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Oct;130(10):1175-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.10.1175.
4
Aural irrigation using the OtoClear Safe Irrigation System in children.在儿童中使用OtoClear安全冲洗系统进行耳部冲洗。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Oct;68(10):1295-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.04.033.
5
Prevention of cerumen impaction by treatment of ear canal skin. A pilot randomized controlled study.通过治疗耳道皮肤预防耵聍栓塞。一项初步随机对照研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;30(2):112-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00952.x.
6
Clinical Practice Guideline (Update): Earwax (Cerumen Impaction).临床实践指南(更新版):耵聍(耵聍栓塞)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan;156(1_suppl):S1-S29. doi: 10.1177/0194599816671491.
7
Ceruminolytic effects of docusate sodium: a randomized, controlled trial.多库酯钠的耵聍溶解作用:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;36(3):228-32. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.109166.
8
Managing earwax in primary care: efficacy of self-treatment using a bulb syringe.基层医疗中耵聍的处理:使用球囊注射器自我治疗的效果
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jan;58(546):44-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X263811.
9
How we do it: technical note: endoscopic removal of cerumen.我们的做法:技术说明:内镜下清除耵聍
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Apr;31(2):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01153.x.
10
Water as a fast acting wax softening agent before ear syringing.在耳部冲洗前,水作为一种快速起效的蜡质软化剂。
Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Apr;34(4):303-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of manual removal and irrigation in cerumen removal in children.儿童耵聍清除中手法清除与冲洗的安全性及有效性评估
Sci Prog. 2025 Apr-Jun;108(2):368504251345886. doi: 10.1177/00368504251345886. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
A veterinary cerumenomic assay for bovine laminitis identification.一种用于牛蹄叶炎鉴定的兽医耳垢分析方法。
Vet Res Commun. 2024 Apr;48(2):1003-1013. doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10271-2. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
3
Insights into cerumen and application in diagnostics: past, present and future prospective.
耳垢的研究进展及其在诊断中的应用:过去、现在和未来展望。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Oct 15;27(3):030503. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030503.