Suppr超能文献

通过监测活检对肾移植中他克莫司/霉酚酸酯和他克莫司/西罗莫司联合方案中避免使用类固醇的比较。

Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy.

作者信息

Anil Kumar Mysore S, Heifets Michael, Fyfe Billie, Saaed Muhammad I, Moritz Michael J, Parikh Miten H, Kumar Aparna

机构信息

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Drexel University College of Medicine and Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2005 Sep 27;80(6):807-14. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000173378.28790.0b.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored.

RESULTS

Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P = 0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P = 0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.

摘要

背景

肾移植中慢性类固醇治疗有诸多副作用,避免使用类固醇已变得可行。这项前瞻性研究比较了肾移植中他克莫司(TAC)/霉酚酸酯(MMF)和TAC/西罗莫司(SRL)联合方案避免使用类固醇的安全性和有效性。

方法

共分析了150例肾移植受者:TAC/MMF组和TAC/SRL组各75例。主要终点是急性排斥反应。完成监测活检以分析亚临床急性排斥反应(SCAR)和慢性移植肾肾病(CAN)。急性排斥反应和SCAR采用甲泼尼龙治疗。监测两年的患者和移植物存活率、肾功能及不良反应。

结果

TAC/MMF组12%的患者和TAC/SRL组8%的患者发生了急性排斥反应。TAC/MMF组和TAC/SRL组的两年预期患者存活率分别为95%和97%,移植物存活率分别为90%和90%。监测活检显示,两年时TAC/MMF组SCAR的累积发生率为27%,TAC/SRL组为16%(P = 0.04)。总体而言,TAC/MMF组33%的受者和TAC/SRL组20%的受者因急性排斥反应/SCAR接受了甲泼尼龙治疗。TAC/SRL组中重度CAN为10%,TAC/MMF组为22%(P = 0.06)。两组新发糖尿病(NODM)的发生率均为4%。所有受者均未接受维持性类固醇治疗。

结论

在基于他克莫司的免疫抑制方案中联合MMF或SRL避免使用类固醇,可使患者和移植物获得相当的两年存活率,急性排斥反应和NODM的发生率较低。与TAC/MMF组相比,TAC/SRL组的SCAR和CAN较低。TAC/SRL组SCAR和CAN的降低对长期移植物存活和功能的影响有待评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验