• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心胸重症监护病房和心胸外科术后护理病房中患者安全事件的报告与分类

Reporting and classification of patient safety events in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit and cardiothoracic postoperative care unit.

作者信息

Nast Patricia A, Avidan Michael, Harris Carolyn B, Krauss Melissa J, Jacobsohn Eric, Petlin Ann, Dunagan W Claiborne, Fraser Victoria J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;130(4):1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.003
PMID:16214531
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate a new mechanism for reporting and classifying patient safety events to increase reporting and identify patient safety priorities.

METHODS

A voluntary patient safety event reporting system accessible by all health care workers was implemented in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care and Post Anesthesia Care Units. Information collected included patient identifiers; date, time, and location of report and event; type and description of event; and severity score. Narrative descriptions of events were analyzed and coded to describe when in the care process the event occurred, what occurred, and a causal classification of why the event occurred.

RESULTS

A total of 163 reports describing 157 events were received. These included 121 events reported from the intensive care unit (25.3 reported events per 1000 patient-days), a 3-fold increase compared with the preexisting on-line reporting system. A total of 113 reports (69%) came from nurses, 31 from physicians (19%), and 10 from other staff (6%). A majority of events (85, 54%) reached the patient but caused no harm. Multiple causes were identified for the majority of events. The most frequent causes were related to human factors (48%) and organizational factors (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

Health care workers were willing to use the patient safety event reporting system, which yielded a broad range of patient safety data. Patient safety events are multifaceted and often have multiple causal factors. Application of a causal classification model for patient safety event coding in the intensive care and preoperative and postoperative care units is feasible and facilitates local communication of important event-related information.

摘要

目的

评估一种用于报告和分类患者安全事件的新机制,以增加报告数量并确定患者安全优先事项。

方法

在心胸重症监护病房和麻醉后护理病房实施了所有医护人员均可访问的自愿性患者安全事件报告系统。收集的信息包括患者标识符;报告和事件的日期、时间和地点;事件类型和描述;以及严重程度评分。对事件的叙述性描述进行分析和编码,以描述事件在护理过程中的发生时间、发生了什么以及事件发生原因的因果分类。

结果

共收到163份描述157起事件的报告。其中包括重症监护病房报告的121起事件(每1000患者日报告25.3起事件),与原有的在线报告系统相比增加了两倍。共有113份报告(69%)来自护士,31份来自医生(19%),10份来自其他工作人员(6%)。大多数事件(85起,54%)影响到了患者,但未造成伤害。大多数事件确定了多种原因。最常见的原因与人为因素(48%)和组织因素(34%)有关。

结论

医护人员愿意使用患者安全事件报告系统,该系统产生了广泛的患者安全数据。患者安全事件是多方面的,通常有多种因果因素。在重症监护病房以及术前和术后护理病房应用患者安全事件编码的因果分类模型是可行的,并且有助于重要事件相关信息的本地交流。

相似文献

1
Reporting and classification of patient safety events in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit and cardiothoracic postoperative care unit.心胸重症监护病房和心胸外科术后护理病房中患者安全事件的报告与分类
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;130(4):1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.003.
2
Patient safety event reporting in critical care: a study of three intensive care units.重症监护中的患者安全事件报告:对三个重症监护病房的研究
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1068-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259384.76515.83.
3
A new safety event reporting system improves physician reporting in the surgical intensive care unit.一种新的安全事件报告系统改善了外科重症监护病房中医师的报告情况。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jun;202(6):881-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.02.035.
4
Electronic reporting to improve patient safety.电子报告以提高患者安全。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):281-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.281.
5
Pediatric safety incidents from an intensive care reporting system.儿科重症监护报告系统中的安全事件。
J Patient Saf. 2009 Jun;5(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181a70c68.
6
Increasing patient safety event reporting in 2 intensive care units: a prospective interventional study.提高 2 家重症监护病房的患者安全事件报告率:一项前瞻性干预研究。
J Crit Care. 2011 Aug;26(4):431.e11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
7
Implementation of an event reporting system in a transfusion medicine unit: a local experience.输血医学科事件报告系统的实施:本地经验
Malays J Pathol. 2004 Jun;26(1):43-8.
8
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
9
Reevaluating the safety profile of pediatrics: a comparison of computerized adverse drug event surveillance and voluntary reporting in the pediatric environment.重新评估儿科用药安全性:儿科环境中计算机化药物不良事件监测与自愿报告的比较。
Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1201-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2609.
10
The safety of hospital stroke care.医院中风护理的安全性。
Neurology. 2007 Feb 20;68(8):550-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000254992.39919.2e.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the impact of an asynchronous communication platform versus existing communication methods: an observational study.考察异步通信平台与现有通信方法的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Innov. 2021 Jan;7(1):68-74. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000409. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
An analysis of near misses identified by anesthesia providers in the intensive care unit.对重症监护病房麻醉医护人员识别出的险些发生的医疗差错的分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Jun 17;15:93. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0075-z.
3
Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review.
基于证据的医院环境中导致患者安全事件因素框架的制定:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):369-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000443. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
4
The use of wireless e-mail to improve healthcare team communication.利用无线电子邮件改善医疗团队沟通。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):705-13. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2299. Epub 2009 Jun 30.