Saunders Gary W
Centre for Environmental & Molecular Algal Research, Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 6E1.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1879-88. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1719.
Marine macroalgae, especially the Rhodophyta, can be notoriously difficult to identify owing to their relatively simple morphology and anatomy, convergence, rampant phenotypic plasticity, and alternation of heteromorphic generations. It is thus not surprising that algal systematists have come to rely heavily on genetic tools for molecular assisted alpha taxonomy. Unfortunately the number of suitable marker systems in the three available genomes is enormous and, although most workers have settled on one of three or four models, the lack of an accepted standard hinders the comparison of results between laboratories. The advantages of a standard system are obvious for practical purposes of species discovery and identification; as well, compliance with a universal marker, such as cox1 being developed under the label 'DNA barcode', would allow algal systematists to benefit from the rapidly emerging technologies. Novel primers were developed for red algae to PCR amplify and sequence the 5' cox1 'barcode' region and were used to assess three known species-complex questions: (i) Mazzaella species in the Northeast Pacific; (ii) species of the genera Dilsea and Neodilsea in the Northeast Pacific; and (iii) Asteromenia peltata from three oceans. These models were selected because they have all caused confusion with regards to species number, distribution, and identification in the field, and because they have all been studied with molecular tools. In all cases the DNA barcode resolved accurately and unequivocally species identities and, with the enhanced sampling here, turned up a variety of novel observations in need of further taxonomic investigation.
海洋大型藻类,尤其是红藻,因其形态和解剖结构相对简单、趋同现象、显著的表型可塑性以及异型世代交替,往往极难鉴定。因此,藻类分类学家严重依赖遗传工具进行分子辅助的α分类,也就不足为奇了。不幸的是,在三个可用基因组中,合适的标记系统数量众多,尽管大多数研究人员已选定三四种模型之一,但缺乏公认的标准阻碍了不同实验室之间结果的比较。对于物种发现和鉴定的实际目的而言,标准系统的优势显而易见;此外,采用通用标记,如正在“DNA条形码”标签下开发的细胞色素c氧化酶亚基1(cox1),将使藻类分类学家能够受益于迅速涌现的技术。我们为红藻开发了新型引物,用于PCR扩增和测序5' cox1“条形码”区域,并用于评估三个已知的物种复合体问题:(i)东北太平洋的马泽藻属物种;(ii)东北太平洋的迪尔藻属和新迪尔藻属物种;以及(iii)来自三大洋的盾形星芒藻。选择这些模型是因为它们在物种数量、分布和野外鉴定方面均造成了混淆,并且都已用分子工具进行过研究。在所有案例中,DNA条形码都准确无误地解析了物种身份,并且通过此处增加的样本采集,发现了各种需要进一步分类学研究的新观察结果。