Seed Thomas M
VSL Physics, Hannon Hall, Room 408, Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20064, USA.
Health Phys. 2005 Nov;89(5):531-45. doi: 10.1097/01.hp.0000175153.19745.25.
In today's heightened nuclear/biological/chemical threat environment, there is an increased need to have safe and effective means to protect not only special high-risk service groups, but also the general population at large, from the health hazards of unintended ionizing radiation exposures. An unfulfilled dream has been to have a globally effective pharmacologic that could be easily taken orally without any undue side effects prior to a suspected or impending nuclear/radiological event; such an ideal radioprotective agent has yet to be identified, let alone fully developed and approved for human use. No one would argue against the fact that this is problematic and needs to be corrected, but where might the ultimate solution to this difficult problem be found? Without question, representative species of the aminothiol family [e.g., Amifostine (MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland)] have proven to be potent cytoprotectants for normal tissues subjected to irradiation or to radiomimetic chemicals. Although Amifostine is currently used clinically, drug toxicity, limited times of protection, and unfavorable routes of administration, all serve to limit the drug's utility in nonclinical settings. A full range of research and development strategies is being employed currently in the hunt for new safe and effective radioprotectants. These include: (1) large scale screening of new chemical classes or natural products; (2) restructuring/reformulating older protectants with proven efficacies but unwanted toxicities; (3) using nutraceuticals that are only moderately protective but are essentially nontoxic; (4) using low dose combinations of potentially toxic but efficacious agents that protect through different routes to foster radioprotective synergy; and (5) accepting a lower level of drug efficacy in lieu of reduced toxicity, banking on the premise that the protection afforded can be leveraged by post-exposure therapies. Although it is difficult to predict which of these strategies will ultimately prove to be successful, it is certain that the probability of a useful protectant being fielded is increased significantly. This is due to the resurgence of interest in radiation protection, increased resources being expended by federal agencies, and by the Food and Drug Administration's willingness to innovate relative to new approval guidance.
在当今核/生物/化学威胁加剧的环境下,不仅对于特殊的高风险服务群体,而且对于广大普通民众而言,都愈发需要有安全有效的手段来保护他们免受意外电离辐射暴露带来的健康危害。一个尚未实现的梦想是拥有一种全球通用且有效的药物,它能够在疑似或即将发生核/放射性事件之前轻松口服,且没有任何不良副作用;这样一种理想的辐射防护剂尚未被发现,更不用说得到充分研发并获批供人类使用了。没有人会反对这一问题的存在以及需要加以纠正,但这个难题的最终解决方案可能在哪里找到呢?毫无疑问,氨硫醇家族的代表性物种[例如氨磷汀(MedImmune公司,马里兰州盖瑟斯堡)]已被证明是对遭受辐射或放射模拟化学物质作用的正常组织有效的细胞保护剂。尽管氨磷汀目前已在临床使用,但药物毒性、有限的保护时间以及不利的给药途径,都限制了该药物在非临床环境中的效用。目前正在采用一系列全面的研发策略来寻找新的安全有效的辐射防护剂。这些策略包括:(1)对新化学类别或天然产物进行大规模筛选;(2)对已证实有效但存在不良毒性的旧有防护剂进行结构重组/重新配方;(3)使用防护作用中等但基本无毒的营养保健品;(4)使用低剂量组合的潜在有毒但有效的药物,这些药物通过不同途径发挥保护作用以促进辐射防护协同效应;以及(5)接受较低水平的药物疗效以换取毒性降低,前提是所提供的保护能够通过暴露后治疗加以利用。尽管很难预测这些策略中哪一个最终会被证明是成功的,但可以肯定的是,推出一种有用的防护剂的可能性已显著增加。这是由于对辐射防护的兴趣再度兴起、联邦机构投入的资源增加,以及食品药品监督管理局在新的批准指南方面愿意创新。