Weiss J F
Office of International Health Programs, U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown, MD 20874-1290, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Dec;105 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1473-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61473.
Studies on mechanisms of radioprotection are leading to a more rational use of protectors for different applications. In considering the feasibility of radioprotectors that act through various mechanisms, it is necessary to distinguish the application needed, e.g., protection against accidental external or internal exposures, acute high-dose radiation injury or low doses over a long period, high-LET radiation exposures during space flight, and protection of normal tissues of cancer patients who are undergoing therapy. Protectors generally are classified as either sulfhydryl compounds, other antioxidants, or receptor-mediated agents (e.g., bioactive lipids, cytokines, and growth factors). This review focuses on comparative radioprotection and toxicity studies in mice using the most effective phosphorothioate agents designated as WR-compounds and other classes of protectors. The superiority of phosphorothioates (WR-2721, WR-151327) as radioprotectors appears to be related to their high affinity for DNA and the similarity in structure of phosphorothioate metabolites to polyamines, and their effects on processes related to DNA structure and synthesis. Drug tolerance levels are available from clinical trials using WR-2721 (amifostine) and provide a basis for discussions of the disadvantages of phosphorothioate administration outside a clinical setting. In this regard, arguments are presented against the current use of WR-2721 by Department of Energy personnel for planned radiation exposures during emergencies. Future research may demonstrate, however, that pharmacologic agents could be useful in accident scenarios, especially when used in combination with therapeutic measures. Assessment of potential prophylactic measures should consider compatibility with therapeutic measures currently in use or ones that might be available in the future for the treatment of radiation injuries. These include antiemetics, purified stem cells, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and other cytokines. Their potential usefulness against radiation-induced mutagenesis of pre- and postexposure administration of phosphorothioates and other classes of protectors should be corroborated in humans.
对辐射防护机制的研究正促使人们更合理地将防护剂用于不同的应用场景。在考虑通过各种机制发挥作用的辐射防护剂的可行性时,有必要区分所需的应用,例如针对意外的外部或内部照射、急性高剂量辐射损伤或长期低剂量辐射、太空飞行期间的高传能线密度辐射照射以及正在接受治疗的癌症患者正常组织的保护。防护剂通常分为巯基化合物、其他抗氧化剂或受体介导剂(如生物活性脂质、细胞因子和生长因子)。本综述重点关注使用被指定为WR化合物的最有效硫代磷酸酯类药物和其他类别的防护剂在小鼠中进行的比较辐射防护和毒性研究。硫代磷酸酯类(WR - 2721、WR - 151327)作为辐射防护剂的优越性似乎与其对DNA的高亲和力、硫代磷酸酯代谢产物与多胺的结构相似性以及它们对与DNA结构和合成相关过程的影响有关。使用WR - 2721(氨磷汀)的临床试验提供了药物耐受水平,为讨论在临床环境之外使用硫代磷酸酯类药物的缺点提供了依据。在这方面,有人反对能源部人员目前在紧急情况下计划辐射照射时使用WR - 2721。然而,未来的研究可能表明,药物制剂在事故场景中可能有用,特别是与治疗措施联合使用时。对潜在预防措施的评估应考虑与目前正在使用的或未来可能用于治疗辐射损伤的治疗措施的兼容性。这些措施包括止吐药、纯化干细胞、粒细胞集落刺激因子和其他细胞因子。它们对硫代磷酸酯类和其他类别的防护剂在暴露前和暴露后给药时抗辐射诱导诱变的潜在有用性应在人体中得到证实。