Park Sangtae, Meng Maxwell V, Elkin Eric P, Speight Joycelyn L, DuChane Janeen, Carroll Peter R
Department of Urology, Program in Urologic Oncology and Urologic Outcomes Research Group, University of California-San Francisco/Mt. Zion Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94115-1711, USA.
J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1802-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000177089.93728.20.
Recent data support the role of androgen deprivation in men undergoing external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The benefits of neoadjuvant, concurrent or adjuvant treatment have been limited to men at intermediate and high risk. We examined the patterns and predictors of androgen deprivation in men undergoing external beam radiation therapy in CaPSURE.
CaPSURE is an observational, longitudinal disease registry, from which 932 men met study inclusion criteria. Androgen deprivation was classified as neoadjuvant-within 9 months of radiation or adjuvant-from the start of radiation to 6 months after completion. Time trends in androgen deprivation as well factors associated with combined therapy were elucidated using multivariate analyses.
In this study 40%, 39% and 21% of men could be categorized into high, intermediate and low risk groups, respectively. Overall 42% and 33% of patients received neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, respectively. Between 1997 and 2002 neoadjuvant hormone use increased significantly in all risk groups, including patients at low risk. On multivariate analyses only the year of diagnosis and clinical risk group were associated with receiving androgen deprivation with radiation.
A significant increase in combined androgen deprivation and external radiation was observed in the last decade in men with intermediate and high risk disease. Nevertheless, more widespread acceptance is necessary since a substantial minority continue to receive radiation alone. Many patients with low risk disease that is amenable to radiation monotherapy also receive androgen deprivation. No clinical or sociodemographic features predicted the use of androgen deprivation with external radiation.
近期数据支持雄激素剥夺疗法在接受前列腺癌体外放疗男性中的作用。新辅助、同步或辅助治疗的益处仅限于中高危男性。我们在CaPSURE研究中调查了接受体外放疗男性的雄激素剥夺模式及预测因素。
CaPSURE是一项观察性纵向疾病登记研究,932名男性符合研究纳入标准。雄激素剥夺分为新辅助(放疗前9个月内)或辅助(放疗开始至结束后6个月)。通过多变量分析阐明雄激素剥夺的时间趋势以及与联合治疗相关的因素。
本研究中,分别有40%、39%和21%的男性可分为高、中、低风险组。总体而言,分别有42%和33%的患者接受了新辅助和辅助雄激素剥夺治疗。1997年至2002年期间,所有风险组(包括低风险患者)的新辅助激素使用显著增加。多变量分析显示,仅诊断年份和临床风险组与接受雄激素剥夺联合放疗相关。
在过去十年中,中高危疾病男性接受雄激素剥夺联合体外放疗的比例显著增加。然而,由于仍有相当一部分患者继续仅接受放疗,因此需要更广泛地接受这种联合治疗。许多适合单纯放疗的低风险疾病患者也接受了雄激素剥夺治疗。没有临床或社会人口统计学特征能够预测雄激素剥夺联合体外放疗的使用情况。