Novitsky Yuri W, Sing Ronald F, Kercher Kent W, Griffo Martha L, Matthews Brent D, Heniford B Todd
Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28232, USA.
Am Surg. 2005 Aug;71(8):627-31; discussion 631-2.
Incomplete or inaccurate operative notes result in delayed, reduced, or denied reimbursement. Deficient reports may be more common when dictated by the surgical residents. We performed a blinded study to assess the accuracy of residents' dictations and their effect on the appropriate level of coding for reimbursement. A prospective, blinded study was performed comparing operative reports dictated by senior surgical residents (postgraduate years 3, 4, and 5) to reports dictated by attending surgeons. All residents had previously undergone group instruction on the importance and structure of operative notes. The trainees were blinded to the fact that the attending surgeons were dictating the operative reports on a separate dictation system. The dictations were analyzed by faculty reimbursement billing personnel for accuracy and completeness. Fifty operative reports of general surgical procedures dictated by both surgical residents and attending physicians were reviewed. A total of 97 CPT codes were used to report services rendered. Residents' dictations resulted in incorrect coding in 14 cases (28% error rate). The types of inaccuracies were a completely missed procedure (4) and insufficient documentation for an appropriate CPT code and/or modifier (10). All deficiencies occurred in complex, multicode, and/or laparoscopic cases. Sixty-seven per cent of late dictations were incomplete. The financial analysis revealed that deficiencies in resident dictations would have reduced the reimbursement by $18,200 (9.7%). For cases with deficient dictations, 29.5 per cent of charges would have been missed, delayed, or denied if the resident-dictated note was used to justify charges. Operative reports dictated by surgical residents are often incomplete or inaccurate, likely leading to reduced or delayed reimbursement. Dictations of complex, multicode, or laparoscopic surgeries, especially if delayed beyond 24 hours, are likely to contain significant deficiencies that affect billing. Attending surgeons may be better equipped to dictate complex cases. Formal housestaff education, mentorship by the attending faculty, and ongoing quality control may be paramount to minimize documentation errors to ensure appropriate coding for the services rendered.
手术记录不完整或不准确会导致报销延迟、报销金额减少或报销申请被拒绝。当由外科住院医师口述记录时,有缺陷的报告可能更为常见。我们进行了一项盲法研究,以评估住院医师口述记录的准确性及其对适当报销编码水平的影响。我们开展了一项前瞻性盲法研究,将高级外科住院医师(研究生三年级、四年级和五年级)口述的手术报告与主治医生口述的报告进行比较。所有住院医师此前都接受过关于手术记录的重要性和结构的集体培训。实习生并不知晓主治医生是在一个单独的口述系统上记录手术报告。由负责报销计费的教员对这些口述记录进行准确性和完整性分析。我们审查了由外科住院医师和主治医生口述的50份普通外科手术的手术报告。总共使用了97个现行程序编码(CPT)来报告所提供的服务。住院医师的口述记录在14例中导致了编码错误(错误率为28%)。不准确的类型包括完全遗漏的手术(4例)以及缺乏适当的现行程序编码和/或修正符的充分记录(10例)。所有缺陷都发生在复杂、多编码和/或腹腔镜手术病例中。67%的延迟口述记录不完整。财务分析显示,住院医师口述记录中的缺陷会使报销金额减少18,200美元(9.7%)。对于口述记录有缺陷的病例,如果使用住院医师口述的记录来证明收费合理,29.5%的费用将会被遗漏、延迟或拒绝报销。外科住院医师口述的手术报告往往不完整或不准确,这可能会导致报销减少或延迟。复杂、多编码或腹腔镜手术的口述记录,尤其是如果延迟超过24小时,很可能包含影响计费的重大缺陷。主治医生可能更有能力口述复杂病例。正规的住院医师教育、主治教员的指导以及持续的质量控制对于尽量减少记录错误以确保对所提供服务进行适当编码可能至关重要。