Merdad Mazin, Alsayid Hoda, Alsharif Shouq, Rammal Almoaidbellah, Farsi Nada J, Marzouki Hani Z
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Medicine, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 13;16(7):e64446. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64446. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Introduction Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical operation notes is crucial for post-operative care, research and academic purposes, and medico-legal clarity. Several studies have shown their defiency and inaccuracy sometimes, and some methods have been proposed to make them more objective. This study aimed to evaluate the completeness of thyroidectomy operative notes in a tertiary center and to assess the adequacy of video documentation by comparing it to the corresponding operative notes. Methods A retrospective review of thyroidectomy operative notes from 2010 to 2020 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, was performed to ensure completeness. Subsequently, 15 thyroidectomies were video recorded, and their notes were compared to the corresponding written operative notes. The completeness score was calculated based on an item list that included items that had to be included in an operative note. An independent samples t-test was used to compare the completeness score means between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the completeness score means between two or more groups. Result A total of 385 thyroidectomy-operative notes were retrospectively reviewed. The completeness scores ranged between 6% and 89% for the various items that had to be documented, with a mean of 54.47%. The mean score of the video-documented operative record was 83.86%±12.84%, which was significantly higher than the corresponding written operative notes (47.53%±18.06%) (p <0.001). Conclusion Video documentation showed significant improvement compared to the corresponding written and retrospective operative notes. Video recording can also be a valuable tool when teaching anatomy and surgical skills and conducting research.
引言
准确而详细地记录手术记录对于术后护理、研究、学术目的以及医疗法律的明晰性至关重要。多项研究表明,手术记录有时存在不足和不准确之处,并且已经提出了一些方法来使其更加客观。本研究旨在评估一家三级中心甲状腺切除术手术记录的完整性,并通过将视频记录与相应的手术记录进行比较来评估视频记录的充分性。
方法
对沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院2010年至2020年的甲状腺切除术手术记录进行回顾性审查,以确保完整性。随后,对15例甲状腺切除术进行了视频记录,并将其记录与相应的书面手术记录进行比较。基于一份包括手术记录中必须包含项目的清单计算完整性得分。使用独立样本t检验比较两组之间的完整性得分均值。使用单因素方差分析比较两组或更多组之间的完整性得分均值。
结果
共回顾性审查了385份甲状腺切除术手术记录。对于必须记录的各个项目,完整性得分在6%至89%之间,平均为54.47%。视频记录的手术记录的平均得分为83.86%±12.84%,显著高于相应的书面手术记录(47.53%±18.06%)(p<0.001)。
结论
与相应的书面和回顾性手术记录相比,视频记录显示出显著改善。视频记录在教授解剖学和外科技能以及进行研究时也可以是一种有价值的工具。