[The laparoscopic approach to renal tumors outcome of 121 laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy procedures].

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We present and review a single center experience with laparoscopic renal surgery for renal cancer including laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period September 2002 - January 2005, 180 patients underwent laparoscopic renal surgery at our center for several indications. A total of 121 patients underwent radical nephrectomy (76) or partial nephrectomy (45) for solid renal tumors. Their data was recorded and analyzed including age, indication for surgery, operative time, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rates, histological results and outpatient follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 65 years (range: 21-89 years). The indications for surgery were solid, enhancing renal masses. For tumors larger than 4 cm, a radical nephrectomy was performed. Tumors that were smaller than 4 cm were removed by partial nephrectomy. The mean operative time was minutes (range: 70-280 minutes) and the mean blood loss was 220 cc (range: 30-700 cc). The mean blood loss was significantly lower in the radical nephrectomy group (120 cc) than in the partial nephrectomy group (320 cc). In eight patients major intraoperative complications were noted including injury of the hilar vessels (5 cases), inferior vena cava (1 case), large bowel and spleen (one patient) and duodenum (1 case). Conversion to open surgery was needed in nine patients (7.4%), four in the radical nephrectomy and five in the partial nephrectomy group. Major postoperative complications were recorded in two patients who underwent radical nephrectomy (pneumothorax and incarcerated inguinal hernia) and in two patients who underwent partial nephrectomy (urine leakage). The pathological examination demonstrated renal cell carcinoma in 109 cases, oncocytoma in 6 cases, angiomyolipoma in 2 cases, sarcoma of the kidney and metastasis from lung cancer in one case each and a hemorrhagic cyst in one case. In all patients who underwent radical nephrectomy negative surgical margins were obtained, in three patients after partial nephrectomy the surgical margins were focally involved by tumor. The mean tumor size was 5.1 cm and 3.1 cm after radical or partial nephrectomy respectively. During follow-up, none of the patients developed local or distant recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach to kidney cancer seems to be safe and oncologically sound. The low morbidity rate together with the inherent advantages of laparoscopic surgery make this approach attractive and we believe it should be considered the new standard of care for renal cancer.