Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌与卵巢癌遗传学

Breast cancer and ovarian cancer genetics.

作者信息

Edlich Richard F, Winters Kathryne L, Lin Kant Y

机构信息

University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(5):533-45. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i5.60.

Abstract

Breast and ovarian cancers are the second and fifth leading causes of cancer death, respectively, among women in the United States. Individuals with breast cancer have a 20--30% chance of having at least one relative with the disease. However, only 5--10% of the cases are a direct result of germline mutations in highly penetrable genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) as well as genes TP53 and PTEN. Since 1996, genetic testing for these mutations has been clinically available. A strategy for the management of women at increased familial risk of breast and ovarian cancers is described, which includes genetic assessment, chemoprevention, radiologic screening, and clinical and self-examination. Genetic testing should occur within a cancer genetic clinic after genetic counseling. A blood sample allows determination of the presence of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the TP53 gene, the PTEN gene, and the ATM gene. Tumor examination has identified a growth factor receptor gene, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2). With regard to diet and lifestyle, women at increased risk of breast cancer could be advised to reduce dietary fat, avoid obesity, decrease alcohol consumption, and take regular exercise. Although chemoprotection is a valuable consideration, it is important to emphasize that the use of Tamoxifen in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers is not established, nor is the optimum duration of benefit. An overview of the main outcomes of the current published studies confirms a 38% decrease in breast cancer incidence with Tamoxifen but recommends its use be restricted to women at high risk of breast cancer and low risk for potential side effects. The role of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy or prophylactic mastectomy has been controversial for several reasons, including the psychosocial significance of the breast in Western cultures, the wide acceptance of breast conservation in surgery for early breast cancer, and the previous lack of data on its efficacy. The surgical procedure should aim to remove substantially all at-risk breast tissue. However, there is a balance between reduction of cancer risk and cosmetic outcome. Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy can significantly decrease ovarian cancer risk in women who carry BCRA1 mutations. Oophorectomy lowers the risk of breast cancer, even in women who have previously used hormone replacement therapy. There are no published randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of mammographic screening in women under 50 years of age with a family history of breast cancer. However, the published studies do suggest that mammographic screening of a high-risk group of women under 50 years of age may detect cancer at a rate equivalent to that seen in women 10 years older with normal risk. Other initial studies also support MRI as having a greater sensitivity than mammography in high-risk women. Breast clinical and self-examination is often advocated, but its effectiveness is unproved, and only one randomized study has been undertaken in women at risk. On the basis of this study as well as one nonrandomized study, it can be concluded that clinical examination as well as mammography are essential in detecting breast cancer. under 50 years of age with a family history of breast cancer. However, the published studies do suggest that mammographic screening of a high-risk group of women under 50 years of age may detect cancer at a rate equivalent to that seen in women 10 years older with normal risk. Other initial studies also support MRI as having a greater sensitivity than mammography in high-risk women. Breast clinical and self-examination is often advocated, but its effectiveness is unproved, and only one randomized study has been undertaken in women at risk. On the basis of this study as well as one nonrandomized study, it can be concluded that clinical examination as well as mammography are essential in detecting breast cancer.

摘要

在美国女性中,乳腺癌和卵巢癌分别是癌症死亡的第二和第五大主要原因。乳腺癌患者有20%至30%的几率至少有一位亲属患有该疾病。然而,只有5%至10%的病例是由高穿透性基因(如BRCA1和BRCA2(BRCA1/2)以及TP53和PTEN基因)的种系突变直接导致的。自1996年以来,针对这些突变的基因检测已可用于临床。本文描述了一种针对乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族风险增加的女性的管理策略,包括基因评估、化学预防、放射学筛查以及临床和自我检查。基因检测应在遗传咨询后于癌症遗传诊所进行。采集血样可确定BRCA1和BRCA2基因、TP53基因、PTEN基因以及ATM基因的存在情况。肿瘤检查已鉴定出一种生长因子受体基因,即人类表皮生长因子受体(HER-2)。在饮食和生活方式方面,可建议乳腺癌风险增加的女性减少饮食中的脂肪摄入、避免肥胖、减少酒精消费并定期锻炼。尽管化学保护是一个值得考虑的重要方面,但必须强调的是,他莫昔芬在BRCA1和BRCA2突变携带者中的应用尚未确定,其最佳受益持续时间也未明确。对当前已发表研究的主要结果进行的概述证实,他莫昔芬可使乳腺癌发病率降低38%,但建议仅将其用于乳腺癌高风险且潜在副作用风险低的女性。双侧降低风险乳房切除术或预防性乳房切除术的作用一直存在争议,原因有几个,包括乳房在西方文化中的社会心理意义、早期乳腺癌手术中保乳术的广泛接受度以及此前缺乏其疗效数据。手术程序应旨在基本切除所有有风险的乳腺组织。然而,在降低癌症风险和美容效果之间存在平衡。双侧预防性卵巢切除术可显著降低携带BCRA1突变女性的卵巢癌风险。卵巢切除术可降低乳腺癌风险,即使是之前使用过激素替代疗法的女性。目前尚无已发表的随机对照试验来检验乳腺钼靶筛查在有乳腺癌家族史的50岁以下女性中的有效性。然而,已发表的研究确实表明,对50岁以下的高风险女性群体进行乳腺钼靶筛查,其癌症检测率可能与风险正常的60岁女性相当。其他初步研究也支持MRI在高风险女性中比乳腺钼靶具有更高的敏感性。乳房临床检查和自我检查经常被提倡,但其有效性尚未得到证实,并且仅在有风险的女性中进行过一项随机研究。基于这项研究以及一项非随机研究,可以得出结论,临床检查以及乳腺钼靶检查对于检测50岁以下有乳腺癌家族史女性的乳腺癌至关重要。然而,已发表的研究确实表明,对50岁以下的高风险女性群体进行乳腺钼靶筛查,其癌症检测率可能与风险正常的60岁女性相当。其他初步研究也支持MRI在高风险女性中比乳腺钼靶具有更高的敏感性。乳房临床检查和自我检查经常被提倡,但其有效性尚未得到证实,并且仅在有风险的女性中进行过一项随机研究。基于这项研究以及一项非随机研究,可以得出结论,临床检查以及乳腺钼靶检查对于检测50岁以下有乳腺癌家族史女性的乳腺癌至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验