Moisescu-Yiflach Tsuf, Pratt Hillel
Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Behavioral Biology, Gutwirth Building, Haifa.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;116(11):2632-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.006. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
To determine the generality of auditory processing impairment in phonologic dyslexics by studying their auditory Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) and the spatio-temporal distribution of their brain activity to auditory linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli with temporal and spectral discriminating cues.
Fourteen adult phonologic dyslexics and 14 normal reading students, all with high academic achievements, were compared. ERP waveform analysis and current density source estimation (Low resolution Electromagnetic Tomographic Analysis-LORETA) were conducted on 21-channel records from subjects who passively listened or actively discriminated 4 types of auditory stimuli: linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli that differed in spectral or temporal characteristics.
Significant differences were found for all ERP latencies (N1, P2, N2, P3) in response to all stimuli, with dyslexics presenting longer latencies compared to normal readers. Current density distributions and their time courses also differed significantly, regardless of stimulus type or attention allocation. Among normal readers, early activity (around N1) was characterized by a rapid change of maximum activity from right to left temporal lobe. Later activity (around P3) was characterized by a stable temporal activity with bilaterally synchronous peak activity. Among the dyslexics, the early N1 activity was stable with left hemisphere prominence, with no alternation between the hemispheres, while the later P3 activity peaked earlier in the right hemisphere than in the left.
Dyslexics were different from controls in processing all auditory stimuli: verbal and non-verbal stimuli with temporal as well as with spectral discriminating cues. The differences mainly consisted of latency and time courses of current density distributions, beginning as early as N1 and extending to the late P3.
Differences in processing auditory stimuli by phonologic dyslexics are not restricted to linguistic (phonological) stimuli, supporting a general auditory processing impairment in phonologic dyslexia.
通过研究语音诵读困难者的听觉事件相关电位(ERP)以及他们大脑活动对具有时间和频谱辨别线索的听觉语言和非语言刺激的时空分布,来确定语音诵读困难者听觉加工障碍的普遍性。
比较了14名成年语音诵读困难者和14名学业成绩优异的正常阅读学生。对被动聆听或主动辨别4种听觉刺激(频谱或时间特征不同的语言和非语言刺激)的受试者进行21通道记录的ERP波形分析和电流密度源估计(低分辨率电磁断层分析-LORETA)。
在对所有刺激的反应中,所有ERP潜伏期(N1、P2、N2、P3)均发现显著差异,诵读困难者的潜伏期比正常阅读者更长。无论刺激类型或注意力分配如何,电流密度分布及其时间进程也存在显著差异。在正常阅读者中,早期活动(约N1)的特征是最大活动从右颞叶快速向左颞叶变化。后期活动(约P3)的特征是颞叶活动稳定,双侧同步峰值活动。在诵读困难者中,早期N1活动稳定,左半球突出,半球间无交替,而后期P3活动在右半球比在左半球更早达到峰值。
诵读困难者在处理所有听觉刺激(具有时间和频谱辨别线索的言语和非言语刺激)方面与对照组不同。差异主要包括电流密度分布的潜伏期和时间进程,最早始于N1并延伸至晚期P3。
语音诵读困难者在处理听觉刺激方面的差异不限于语言(语音)刺激,支持语音诵读困难中存在普遍的听觉加工障碍。