Harris John, Bortolotti Lisa, Irving Louise
Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, The School of Law, University of Manchester, UK.
Health Care Anal. 2005 Sep;13(3):157-62. doi: 10.1007/s10728-005-6439-7.
The European Union is a nightmare from the perspective of the ethics and regulation of science. A hitherto insoluble problem has been the task of drafting ethical principles which do not founder on the radically different attitudes taken to the question of the moral status of the human embryo. Following the conclusions reached in an international project, EUROSTEM, we suggest that this problem can be solved by concentration on the scope of principles and we emphasize that European research should be funded in a way that does not discriminate between individual states and researchers in the EU. Finally, we observe that the availability of any eventual embryonic stem cell therapies will pose a dilemma for those countries and those people that have declared stem cell research to be unacceptable.
从科学伦理与监管的角度来看,欧盟是一场噩梦。一个迄今为止无法解决的问题是起草伦理原则的任务,这些原则不会因对人类胚胎道德地位问题采取的截然不同的态度而失败。根据国际项目EUROSTEM得出的结论,我们建议这个问题可以通过专注于原则的范围来解决,并且我们强调欧洲研究的资金资助方式不应在欧盟内的各个国家和研究人员之间造成歧视。最后,我们注意到任何最终的胚胎干细胞疗法的可用性将给那些宣称干细胞研究不可接受的国家和人们带来两难困境。