Zehender M, Hohnloser S, Geibel A, Furtwängler A, Olschewski M, Meinertz T, Just H
Medizinische Klinik III, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany.
Br Heart J. 1992 Jun;67(6):491-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.67.6.491.
To assess the clinical criteria predicting the short and long-term efficacy of propafenone, an agent with class IC antiarrhythmic activity and a broad pharmacological profile.
Prospective study of propafenone at doses of 450 to 900 mg/day during a six week dose titration period (including a placebo phase with two separate 24 Holter recordings). Responders to treatment were followed for one year.
One hundred patients with frequent ventricular arrhythmias (greater than 30 extrasystoles/h) of Lown class III and IVA/B and without evidence of myocardial infarction within the past six months.
Multivariate regression analysis of spontaneous arrhythmia variability and of different clinical variables to determine the short and long-term efficacy and safety of propafenone.
Propafenone 450 mg/day was effective in 30/100 patients (30%), and at 600 mg/day another 14 responded. The efficacy of propafenone correlated with a low spontaneous arrhythmia variability and, as shown by multivariate analysis, with a lower patient age (p less than 0.05). When the dose was increased to 900 mg/day a further six (12%) patients responded. However, with increasing doses of propafenone, the one year probability of effective treatment decreased from 86% (450 mg/day) to 67% (600 mg/day) and to 44% (900 mg/day). After restudying the patients at three, six, and 12 months and after dose adjustment in 11/44 patients (25%), 31 patients (70%) remained responders. Loss of permanent antiarrhythmic efficacy was best predicted by the initial dose that achieved a response. No patient died suddenly or had arrhythmogenic effects during Holter monitoring. Side effects occurred in 36% of patients but these rarely limited long-term treatment.
A younger age, low spontaneous arrhythmia variability, and particularly a low titration dose were the best predictors of the short and long term efficacy of propafenone. All other responders should have repeated Holter recordings during the first year of treatment.
评估可预测普罗帕酮短期和长期疗效的临床标准,普罗帕酮是一种具有IC类抗心律失常活性且药理作用广泛的药物。
在为期六周的剂量滴定期(包括一个安慰剂阶段,有两次单独的24小时动态心电图记录)内,对剂量为450至900毫克/天的普罗帕酮进行前瞻性研究。对治疗有反应者随访一年。
100例频发室性心律失常(超过30次早搏/小时)的Lown III级和IVA/B级患者,且在过去六个月内无心肌梗死证据。
对自发性心律失常变异性和不同临床变量进行多变量回归分析,以确定普罗帕酮的短期和长期疗效及安全性。
450毫克/天的普罗帕酮对30/100例患者(30%)有效,600毫克/天时有另外14例有反应。普罗帕酮的疗效与自发性心律失常变异性低相关,多变量分析显示,还与患者年龄较低相关(p<0.05)。当剂量增加到900毫克/天时,又有6例(12%)患者有反应。然而,随着普罗帕酮剂量增加,有效治疗的一年概率从86%(450毫克/天)降至67%(600毫克/天),再降至44%(900毫克/天)。在三个月、六个月和十二个月对患者重新研究,并对11/44例患者(25%)进行剂量调整后,31例患者(70%)仍有反应。实现反应的初始剂量最能预测永久性抗心律失常疗效的丧失。在动态心电图监测期间,无患者突然死亡或出现致心律失常作用。36%的患者出现副作用,但这些副作用很少限制长期治疗。
年龄较小、自发性心律失常变异性低,尤其是滴定剂量低,是普罗帕酮短期和长期疗效的最佳预测指标。所有其他有反应者在治疗的第一年应重复进行动态心电图记录。