Toursarkissian Boulos, Hagino Ryan T, Khan Khurram, Schoolfield John, Shireman Paula K, Harkless Lawrence
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2005 Nov;19(6):769-73. doi: 10.1007/s10016-005-7969-z.
Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is a durable reconstruction in the diabetic patient with limited forefoot gangrene. However, predicting TMA healing remains difficult. Our goals were to (1) determine the success rate of TMA and (2) identify factors predictive of TMA healing, in particular arterial foot anatomy. A retrospective review of all diabetic patients undergoing TMA was done. Blood supply to the foot was classified as mostly anterior (anterior tibial and/or dorsalis pedis artery), mostly posterior (posterior tibial or plantar arteries), or equally distributed (both systems patent or peroneal runoff). Foot vessels were assigned runoff scores from 0 to 3 according to Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery (SVS/ISCVS) criteria. Forty-four TMAs in 29 men and 12 women were reviewed. Revascularization was done in 35 cases. In nine cases (20%), no bypass was deemed necessary (n = 7) or feasible (n = 2). Blood flow to the foot was deemed mostly anterior in 16 cases, mostly posterior in 17 cases, and equally distributed in 11. The TMA was left open in 19 cases and closed with staples or sutures in the rest. Limb salvage was achieved in 30 cases (68%) at a median follow-up of 48 weeks. Three of the four patients on dialysis required leg amputation (75%) vs. 11 of the 40 (27%) nondialysis patients (p = 0.05). When the TMA was left open, leg amputation was more likely (58%) than when closed primarily (12%) (p < 0.01). No angiographic factors were predictive of limb salvage. The need for revascularization was not associated with limb loss, although both patients with no feasible bypass option required below-knee amputation. TMA healing can be expected in a majority of diabetic patients after adequate revascularization but cannot be predicted by angiographic findings. Efforts should be made to achieve primary wound closure.
经跖骨截肢术(TMA)是治疗患有局限性前足坏疽的糖尿病患者的一种持久的重建手术。然而,预测TMA伤口愈合情况仍然困难。我们的目标是:(1)确定TMA的成功率;(2)识别预测TMA愈合的因素,尤其是足部动脉解剖结构。我们对所有接受TMA的糖尿病患者进行了回顾性研究。足部血液供应分为主要为前侧(胫前动脉和/或足背动脉)、主要为后侧(胫后动脉或足底动脉)或分布均匀(两个系统均通畅或有腓动脉分支)。根据血管外科学会/国际心血管外科学会(SVS/ISCVS)标准,足部血管被赋予0至3分的血流分级。我们回顾了29名男性和12名女性患者的44例TMA手术。35例患者进行了血管重建。9例(20%)患者中,认为无需进行旁路手术(7例)或不可行(2例)。足部血流主要为前侧的有16例,主要为后侧的有17例,分布均匀的有11例。19例患者的TMA伤口敞开,其余患者用吻合器或缝线缝合。中位随访48周时,30例(68%)患者实现了保肢。4例接受透析的患者中有3例(75%)需要截肢,而40例非透析患者中有11例(27%)需要截肢(p = 0.05)。当TMA伤口敞开时,截肢的可能性(58%)高于一期缝合时(12%)(p < 0.01)。没有血管造影因素可预测保肢情况。血管重建的需求与肢体缺失无关,尽管两名没有可行旁路手术选择的患者均需要进行膝下截肢。在大多数糖尿病患者中,充分的血管重建后TMA伤口有望愈合,但无法通过血管造影结果预测。应努力实现伤口一期闭合。