Nolan Matthew J, Cribb Thomas H
School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences and Centre for Marine Studies, Parasitology Section, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Adv Parasitol. 2005;60:101-63. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)60002-4.
In just over a decade, the use of molecular approaches for the recognition of parasites has become commonplace. For trematodes, the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA (ITS rDNA) has become the default region of choice. Here, we review the findings of 63 studies that report ITS rDNA sequence data for about 155 digenean species from 19 families, and then review the levels of variation that have been reported and how the variation has been interpreted. Overall, complete ITS sequences (or ITS1 or ITS2 regions alone) usually distinguish trematode species clearly, including combinations for which morphology gives ambiguous results. Closely related species may have few base differences and in at least one convincing case the ITS2 sequences of two "good" species are identical. In some cases, the ITS1 region gives greater resolution than the ITS2 because of the presence of variable repeat units that are generally lacking in the ITS2. Intraspecific variation is usually low and frequently apparently absent. Information on geographical variation of digeneans is limited but at least some of the reported variation probably reflects the presence of multiple species. Despite the accepted dogma that concerted evolution makes the individual representative of the entire species, a significant number of studies have reported at least some intraspecific variation. The significance of such variation is difficult to assess a posteriori, but it seems likely that identification and sequencing errors account for some of it and failure to recognise separate species may also be significant. Some reported variation clearly requires further analysis. The use of a "yardstick" to determine when separate species should be recognised is flawed. Instead, we argue that consistent genetic differences that are associated with consistent morphological or biological traits should be considered the marker for separate species. We propose a generalised approach to the use of rDNA to distinguish trematode species.
在短短十多年的时间里,使用分子方法识别寄生虫已变得很普遍。对于吸虫而言,核糖体DNA的内转录间隔区(ITS rDNA)已成为默认的首选区域。在此,我们回顾了63项研究的结果,这些研究报告了来自19个科约155种复殖吸虫的ITS rDNA序列数据,然后回顾了已报道的变异水平以及对变异的解释方式。总体而言,完整的ITS序列(或单独的ITS1或ITS2区域)通常能清晰地区分吸虫种类,包括形态学结果不明确的组合。亲缘关系相近的物种可能只有很少的碱基差异,并且在至少一个有说服力的案例中,两个“良好”物种的ITS2序列是相同的。在某些情况下,由于ITS1区域存在可变重复单元,而ITS2中通常缺乏这些可变重复单元,所以ITS1区域比ITS2具有更高的分辨率。种内变异通常较低,而且常常明显不存在。关于复殖吸虫地理变异的信息有限,但至少一些已报道的变异可能反映了多个物种的存在。尽管有公认的观点认为协同进化使个体成为整个物种的代表,但大量研究报告了至少一些种内变异。这种变异的重要性很难事后评估,但似乎识别和测序错误可能占了其中一部分,未能识别出不同物种也可能很重要。一些已报道的变异显然需要进一步分析。使用“标准”来确定何时应识别不同物种是有缺陷的。相反,我们认为与一致的形态或生物学特征相关的一致遗传差异应被视为不同物种的标志。我们提出了一种使用rDNA区分吸虫物种的通用方法。