Piper William E, Ogrodniczuk John S, Lamarche Christine, Hilscher Tamara, Joyce Anthony S
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Int J Group Psychother. 2005 Oct;55(4):527-50. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2005.55.4.527.
This study investigated the relationships between initial level of alliance, pattern of alliance over sessions, and outcome in a sample of 107 patients who completed short-term group therapy for complicated grief. Both patient-rated alliance and therapist-rated alliance were studied. For patient-rated alliance, both the initial level of alliance and the linear pattern of alliance were directly and significantly related to favorable outcome. For therapist-rated alliance, no significant direct relationships with outcome were found. Instead, significant interaction effects were found. For patients with relatively high initial alliance, the greater the increase in alliance over sessions, the better the outcome. For patients with relatively low initial alliance, the greater the decrease in alliance over sessions, the better the outcome. Explanations for the findings are considered as well as possible clinical implications.
本研究调查了107名完成复杂性悲伤短期团体治疗的患者样本中,初始联盟水平、各疗程联盟模式与治疗结果之间的关系。研究了患者自评联盟和治疗师评定联盟。对于患者自评联盟,联盟的初始水平和联盟的线性模式均与良好的治疗结果直接且显著相关。对于治疗师评定联盟,未发现与治疗结果有显著的直接关系。相反,发现了显著的交互作用。对于初始联盟水平相对较高的患者,各疗程中联盟增加越多,治疗结果越好。对于初始联盟水平相对较低的患者,各疗程中联盟减少越多,治疗结果越好。文中考虑了这些发现的解释以及可能的临床意义。