Longatti PierLuigi, Fiorindi Alessandro, Martinuzzi Andrea
Department of Neuroscience, Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct;57(4 Suppl):E409; discussion E409. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000176702.26810.b7.
Massive intraventricular hemorrhage requires aggressive and rapid management to decrease intracranial hypertension. The amount of intraventricular blood is a strong prognostic predictor, and its fast removal is a priority. Neuroendoscopy may offer some advantages over more traditional surgical approaches. We describe here the technical details and clinical outcomes of the neuroendoscopic management of massive tetraventricular hemorrhage in 25 consecutive patients, highlighting the potential pitfalls and the advantages of the technique.
Twenty-five patients, aged 7 to 80 years, presenting with massive ventricular hemorrhage were admitted between January 1996 and May 2004 to our neurosurgery unit after an emergency computed tomographic scan. Severity of ventricular hemorrhage was graded according to the Graeb scale; the mean Graeb score was 9.8 +/- 2.9. Hemorrhages were secondary to vascular malformation in 12 cases.
Endoscopy was performed on the first day in 17 cases, with a delay of 1 to 5 days in the remaining 8 cases. A flexible endoscope with "free-hand" technique was always preferred. The ventricular cleaning proceeded in three phases: lateral ventricle, third ventricle, and then aqueduct and fourth ventricle. In selected patients, a catheter, both for intracranial pressure monitoring and for drainage, was positioned. The procedure was successfully completed in all cases. There was no surgery-related mortality. The mean length of intensive care unit stay after the operation was 18 +/- 12 days. Short-term mortality (1 mo) was 12%, whereas long-term (> 6 mo) mortality was 24%. Complete recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale score, 5) was achieved in 40% of cases. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was necessary in 12% of patients.
Intraventricular hemorrhage, analogously to other ventricular diseases, can be treated successfully with flexible endoscopes. Obviously, the limitation of this study lies in its observational nature; however, the encouraging results reported here should prompt a randomized study to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the endoscopic approach in comparison to the more established semiconservative management offered by external derivation with fibrinolytic agents.
大量脑室内出血需要积极快速的治疗以降低颅内高压。脑室内出血量是一个强有力的预后预测指标,快速清除脑室内血液是首要任务。神经内镜相较于更传统的手术方法可能具有一些优势。在此,我们描述连续25例大量四脑室出血患者神经内镜治疗的技术细节及临床结果,突出该技术的潜在陷阱和优势。
1996年1月至2004年5月,25例年龄在7至80岁、表现为大量脑室出血的患者在急诊计算机断层扫描后入住我们的神经外科病房。脑室出血的严重程度根据格雷布量表分级;平均格雷布评分为9.8±2.9。12例出血继发于血管畸形。
17例患者在第一天进行内镜检查,其余8例延迟1至5天。始终首选采用“徒手”技术的软性内镜。脑室清理分三个阶段进行:侧脑室、第三脑室,然后是导水管和第四脑室。在部分患者中,放置了用于颅内压监测和引流的导管。所有病例手术均成功完成。无手术相关死亡。术后重症监护病房平均住院时间为18±12天。短期(1个月)死亡率为12%,而长期(>6个月)死亡率为24%。40%的病例实现了完全康复(格拉斯哥预后量表评分,5分)。12%的患者需要进行脑室腹腔分流术。
脑室内出血与其他脑室疾病类似,可通过软性内镜成功治疗。显然,本研究的局限性在于其观察性;然而,此处报告的令人鼓舞的结果应促使开展一项随机研究,以评估内镜治疗方法与更成熟的使用纤维蛋白溶解剂进行外部引流的半保守治疗相比的有效性和效率。