• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫持续状态的抗惊厥治疗。

Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus.

作者信息

Prasad K, Al-Roomi K, Krishnan P R, Sequeira R

机构信息

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Neurosciences Center, Room No. 704, AIIMS, 11002 New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD003723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003723.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003723.pub2
PMID:16235337
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus is a medical emergency associated with significant mortality and morbidity, which requires immediate and effective treatment.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine whether a particular anticonvulsant is more effective or safer to use in status epilepticus compared to another and compared to placebo.(2) To delineate reasons for disagreement in the literature regarding recommended treatment regimens and to highlight areas for future research.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following electronic databases using the highly sensitive search strategy for identifying published randomised controlled trials: (1) Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (July 2005); (2) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2,2005); (3) MEDLINE (1966 - August 2004); (4) EMBASE (1966 - January 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of participants with premonitory, early, established or refractory status epilepticus using a truly random or quasi-random allocation of treatments were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies with 2017 participants were included. Few studies used the same interventions. Diazepam was better than placebo in reducing the risk of non-cessation of seizures (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.92), requirement for ventilatory support (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.94) or continuation of status epilepticus requiring use of a different drug or general anaesthesia (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.92). Lorazepam was better than placebo for risk of non-cessation of seizures (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.71) and for risk of continuation of status epilepticus requiring a different drug or general anaesthesia (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.71). Lorazepam was better than diazepam for reducing risk of non-cessation of seizures (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.90) and had a lower risk for continuation of status epilepticus requiring a different drug or general anaesthesia (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88). Lorazepam was better than phenytoin for risk of non-cessation of seizures (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86). Diazepam (30 mg intrarectal gel) was better than a lower dose (20 mg intrarectal gel) in premonitory status epilepticus for the risk of seizure continuation (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Lorazepam is better than diazepam or phenytoin alone for cessation of seizures and carries a lower risk of continuation of status epilepticus requiring a different drug or general anaesthesia. Both lorazepam and diazepam are better than placebo for the same outcomes. In the treatment of premonitory seizures, diazepam 30 mg in an intrarectal gel is better than 20 mg for cessation of seizures without a statistically significant increase in adverse effects. Universally accepted definitions of premonitory, early, established and refractory status epilepticus are required.

摘要

背景

癫痫持续状态是一种与严重死亡率和发病率相关的医疗急症,需要立即进行有效治疗。

目的

(1)确定与另一种抗惊厥药物及安慰剂相比,某一特定抗惊厥药物在治疗癫痫持续状态时是否更有效或更安全。(2)阐明文献中关于推荐治疗方案存在分歧的原因,并突出未来研究的领域。

检索策略

我们使用高度敏感的检索策略搜索了以下电子数据库,以识别已发表的随机对照试验:(1)Cochrane癫痫组专业注册库(2005年7月);(2)Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆2005年第2期);(3)医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)(1966年 - 2004年8月);(4)荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)(1966年 - 2003年1月)。

选择标准

纳入使用真正随机或准随机分配治疗方法的、针对有先兆、早期、确诊或难治性癫痫持续状态参与者的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立选择纳入试验、评估试验质量并提取数据。

主要结果

纳入了11项研究,共2017名参与者。很少有研究使用相同的干预措施。地西泮在降低癫痫发作未停止的风险(相对危险度0.73,95%可信区间0.57至0.92)、通气支持需求(相对危险度0.39,95%可信区间0.16至0.94)或需要使用不同药物或全身麻醉的癫痫持续状态持续风险(相对危险度0.73,95%可信区间0.57至0.92)方面优于安慰剂。劳拉西泮在癫痫发作未停止的风险(相对危险度0.52,95%可信区间0.38至0.71)以及需要使用不同药物或全身麻醉的癫痫持续状态持续风险(相对危险度0.52,95%可信区间0.38至0.71)方面优于安慰剂。在降低癫痫发作未停止的风险(相对危险度0.64,95%可信区间0.45至0.90)方面,劳拉西泮优于地西泮,且需要使用不同药物或全身麻醉的癫痫持续状态持续风险较低(相对危险度0.63,95%可信区间0.45至0.88)。在癫痫发作未停止的风险(相对危险度0.62,95%可信区间0.45至0.86)方面,劳拉西泮优于苯妥英钠。在先兆性癫痫持续状态中,地西泮(30毫克直肠凝胶)在癫痫发作持续风险方面优于较低剂量(20毫克直肠凝胶)(相对危险度0.39,95%可信区间0.18至0.86)。

作者结论

在癫痫发作停止方面,劳拉西泮优于单独使用的地西泮或苯妥英钠,且需要使用不同药物或全身麻醉的癫痫持续状态持续风险较低。在相同结局方面,劳拉西泮和地西泮均优于安慰剂。在治疗先兆性癫痫发作时,30毫克直肠凝胶的地西泮在癫痫发作停止方面优于20毫克,且不良反应无统计学意义的显著增加。需要对先兆性、早期、确诊和难治性癫痫持续状态进行普遍接受的定义。

相似文献

1
Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的抗惊厥治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD003723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003723.pub2.
2
Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的抗惊厥治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 10;2014(9):CD003723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003723.pub3.
3
Drug management for acute tonic-clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children.儿童急性强直阵挛性惊厥(包括惊厥性癫痫持续状态)的药物管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 10;1(1):CD001905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001905.pub3.
4
Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的抗惊厥治疗。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jun;63(6):640-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02931.x. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
5
Drug management for acute tonic-clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children.儿童急性强直阵挛性惊厥(包括惊厥性癫痫持续状态)的药物管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD001905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001905.
6
Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.普瑞巴林添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD005612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005612.pub5.
7
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
8
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.
9
Rufinamide add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy.鲁非酰胺辅助治疗难治性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD011772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011772.pub2.
10
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Polypharmacy with tiagabine, levetiracetam, and perampanel in status epilepticus: Insights from EEG, biochemical, and histopathological studies in rats.加巴喷丁、左乙拉西坦和吡仑帕奈联合用药治疗癫痫持续状态:大鼠脑电图、生化及组织病理学研究的见解
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Jun;10(3):669-681. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13141. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
IGNITE Status Epilepticus Survey: A Nationwide Interrogation about the Current Management of Status Epilepticus in Germany.点燃型癫痫持续状态调查:关于德国癫痫持续状态当前管理情况的全国性问询
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 22;11(5):1171. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051171.
3
Diazepam Monotherapy or Diazepam-Ketamine Dual Therapy at Different Time Points Terminates Seizures and Reduces Mortality in a Status Epilepticus Animal Model.
地西泮单药治疗或地西泮-氯胺酮双药治疗在不同时间点终止癫痫持续状态动物模型的发作并降低死亡率。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Dec 6;27:e934043. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934043.
4
Emergency management of the paediatric patient with convulsive status epilepticus.小儿惊厥持续状态的急诊处理
Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Jan 21;26(1):50-66. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxaa127. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Levetiracetam as an alternative to phenytoin for second-line emergency treatment of children with convulsive status epilepticus: the EcLiPSE RCT.左乙拉西坦作为苯妥英钠的替代药物,用于惊厥性癫痫持续状态儿童的二线急救治疗:EcLiPSE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(58):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta24580.
6
Efficacy, Safety, and Economics of Intravenous Levetiracetam for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.静脉注射左乙拉西坦治疗癫痫持续状态的疗效、安全性及经济学分析:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 21;11:751. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00751. eCollection 2020.
7
Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 3;2(2):CD009202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub4.
8
Comparison of drug delivery with autoinjector versus manual prefilled syringe and between three different autoinjector devices administered in pig thigh.在猪大腿中使用自动注射器与手动预填充注射器进行药物递送的比较,以及三种不同自动注射器装置之间的比较。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Aug 2;9:257-66. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S83406. eCollection 2016.
9
Evidence-Based Guideline: Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children and Adults: Report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society.循证指南:儿童及成人惊厥性癫痫持续状态的治疗:美国癫痫协会指南委员会报告
Epilepsy Curr. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):48-61. doi: 10.5698/1535-7597-16.1.48.
10
Pharmacotherapy for Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的药物治疗
Drugs. 2015 Sep;75(13):1499-521. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0454-2.