Casimiro L, Barnsley L, Brosseau L, Milne S, Robinson V A, Tugwell P, Wells G
University of Ottawa, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003788.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has been used by rehabilitation specialists as an adjunct therapy for the symptomatic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Acupuncture is a traditional Chinese medicine where thin needles are inserted in specific documented points believed to represent concentration of body energies. In some cases a small electrical impulse is added to the needles. Once the needles are inserted in some of the appropriate points, endorphins, morphine-like substances, have been shown to be released in the patient's system, thus inducing local or generalised analgesia (pain relief). This review is an update of the original review published in July 2002. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of acupuncture or electroacupuncture on the objective and subjective measures of disease activity in patients with RA. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, Current Contents , Sports Discus and CINAHL, initially done in September 2001, was updated in May 2005. The Cochrane Field of Rehabilitation and Related Therapies and the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group were also contacted for a search of their specialized registries. Handsearching was conducted on all retrieved papers and content experts were contacted to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Comparative controlled studies, such as randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials in patients with RA were eligible. Trials published in languages other than French and English were not analyzed. Abstracts were excluded unless further data could be obtained from the authors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers identified potential articles from the literature search and extracted data using pre-defined extraction forms. Consensus was reached on all the extracted data. Quality was assessed by two reviewers using a five point validated tool that measured the quality of randomization, double-blinding and description of withdrawals. MAIN RESULTS: After the updated searches were conducted, five further potential articles were identified; however, these did not meet the inclusion criteria. Two studies involving a total of 84 people were included. One study used acupuncture while the other used electroacupuncture. In the acupuncture study, no statistically significant difference was found between groups for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale for patient's global assessment (VAS G), number of swollen joints and tender joints, general health questionnaire (GHQ), modified disease activity scale (DAS) or for the decrease in analgesic intake. Although not statistically significant, pain in the treatment group improved by 4 points on a 0-100mm visual analogue scale versus no improvement in the placebo group. In the second study, using electroacupuncture, a significant decrease in knee pain was reported in the experimental group, 24 hours post treatment, when compared to the placebo group (WMD: -2.0 with 95% CI -3.6,-4.0). A significant decrease was found also at four months post-treatment (WMD -0.2, 95% CI: -0.36, -0.04) AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although the results of the study on electroacupuncture show that electroacupuncture may be beneficial to reduce symptomatic knee pain in patients with RA 24 hours and 4 months post treatment, the reviewers concluded that the poor quality of the trial, including the small sample size preclude its recommendation. The reviewers further conclude that acupuncture has no effect on ESR, CRP, pain, patient's global assessment, number of swollen joints, number of tender joints, general health, disease activity and reduction of analgesics. These conclusions are limited by methodological considerations such as the type of acupuncture (acupuncture vs electroacupuncture), the site of intervention, the low number of clinical trials and the small sample size of the included studies.
背景:康复专家已将针灸用作类风湿关节炎(RA)症状治疗的辅助疗法。针灸是一种传统中医疗法,将细针插入特定的、有记录的穴位,这些穴位被认为是人体能量的聚集点。在某些情况下,会给针施加小的电脉冲。一旦针插入一些合适的穴位,内啡肽,即类似吗啡的物质,已被证明会在患者体内释放,从而产生局部或全身性镇痛(缓解疼痛)。本综述是对2002年7月发表的原始综述的更新。 目的:评估针灸或电针疗法对类风湿关节炎患者疾病活动的客观和主观测量指标的影响。 检索策略:最初于2001年9月对MEDLINE、EMBASE、PEDro、《现刊目次》、《体育文献数据库》和CINAHL进行了全面检索,并于2005年5月更新。还联系了Cochrane康复及相关疗法领域和Cochrane肌肉骨骼综述小组,检索其专门的注册库。对所有检索到的论文进行手工检索,并联系内容专家以识别其他研究。 入选标准:符合条件的为比较对照研究,如类风湿关节炎患者的随机对照试验和对照临床试验。未分析以法语和英语以外语言发表的试验。除非能从作者处获得更多数据,否则排除摘要。 数据收集与分析:两名独立评审员从文献检索中识别潜在文章,并使用预定义的提取表提取数据。对所有提取的数据达成了共识。由两名评审员使用经过验证的五分制工具评估质量,该工具测量随机化、双盲和撤药描述的质量。 主要结果:在进行更新检索后,又识别出5篇潜在文章;然而,这些文章不符合纳入标准。纳入了两项研究,共涉及84人。一项研究使用针灸,另一项使用电针。在针灸研究中,两组在红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、患者整体评估视觉模拟量表(VAS G)、肿胀关节数和压痛关节数、一般健康问卷(GHQ)、改良疾病活动量表(DAS)或镇痛剂摄入量减少方面,未发现统计学上的显著差异。虽然无统计学显著性,但治疗组的疼痛在0 - 100mm视觉模拟量表上改善了4分,而安慰剂组无改善。在第二项使用电针的研究中,与安慰剂组相比,治疗后24小时,试验组报告膝关节疼痛显著减轻(加权均数差:-2.0,95%置信区间-3.6,-4.0)。治疗后四个月也发现显著减轻(加权均数差-0.2,95%置信区间:-0.36,-0.04) 作者结论:尽管电针研究结果表明电针可能有利于在治疗后24小时和4个月减轻类风湿关节炎患者的膝关节症状性疼痛,但评审员得出结论,该试验质量较差,包括样本量小,因此不建议使用。评审员进一步得出结论,针灸对ESR、CRP、疼痛、患者整体评估、肿胀关节数、压痛关节数、一般健康、疾病活动和镇痛剂减少无影响。这些结论受到方法学因素的限制,如针灸类型(针灸与电针)、干预部位、临床试验数量少以及纳入研究的样本量小。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-4-18
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022-8-29
J Tradit Complement Med. 2022-4-21
Front Psychiatry. 2021-8-20
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000-10
Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999-9
Control Clin Trials. 1996-2
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994
BMJ. 1994-11-12
Union Med Can. 1981-12
J Rheumatol. 1974-3