Wijkstra J, Lijmer J, Balk F, Geddes J, Nolen W A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004044.pub2.
Regarding the pharmacological treatment of psychotic depression there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of an antidepressant alone compared to the combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic.
To compare the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for patients with a psychotic depression: antidepressant monotherapy, antipsychotic monotherapy, and the combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic, compared with each other and/or with placebo.
(1) The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was screened with the terms depressive disorder and drug treatment (April 2004). (2) MEDLINE (1966 to April 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2004) were searched using terms with regard to treatment of unipolar psychotic depression.(3) Reference lists of related reviews and reference lists of all identified studies were searched.(4) Personal communications.
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with patients with major depression with psychotic features as well as RCTs with patients with major depression with or without psychotic features which reported on the subgroup of patients with psychotic features separately.
Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, according to the Cochrane Handbook criteria. Data were entered into RevMan 4.2.5. We used intention-to-treat data. For dichotomous efficacy outcomes, the relative risk with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated. For continuously distributed outcomes, it was not possible to extract data from the RCTs. Regarding the primary harm outcome, only overall drop-out rates were available for all studies.
The search identified 3333 abstracts, but only 10 RCTs with a total of 548 patients could be included in the review. Due to clinical heterogeneity, few meta-analyses were possible. We found no conclusive evidence that the combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic is more effective than an antidepressant alone (two RCTs; RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.41), but a combination is more effective than an antipsychotic alone (three RCTs; RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.80). There were no statistically significant differences in the overall drop-out rates between any of the treatments, neither in individual studies nor after pooling of studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with an antipsychotic alone is not a good option. Starting with an antidepressant alone and adding an antipsychotic if the patient does not respond or starting with the combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic both appear appropriate options for patients with psychotic depression. In clinical practice the balance between risks and benefits suggests that initial antidepressive monotherapy and adding an antipsychotic if there is inadequate response should be the preferred treatment strategy for many patients. The general lack of available data limits confidence in the conclusions drawn.
关于精神病性抑郁症的药物治疗,与抗抑郁药和抗精神病药联合使用相比,单独使用抗抑郁药的有效性尚不确定。
比较精神病性抑郁症患者药物治疗的临床效果:抗抑郁药单药治疗、抗精神病药单药治疗以及抗抑郁药与抗精神病药联合治疗,相互之间以及与安慰剂进行比较。
(1)使用抑郁障碍和药物治疗检索词对Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)进行筛选(2004年4月)。(2)使用关于单相精神病性抑郁症治疗的检索词检索MEDLINE(1966年至2004年4月)和EMBASE(1980年至2004年4月)。(3)检索相关综述的参考文献列表以及所有已识别研究的参考文献列表。(4)个人交流。
所有针对伴有精神病性特征的重度抑郁症患者的随机对照试验(RCT),以及针对伴有或不伴有精神病性特征的重度抑郁症患者且分别报告了伴有精神病性特征患者亚组情况的RCT。
两名评价员根据Cochrane手册标准评估纳入研究的方法学质量。数据录入RevMan 4.2.5。我们使用意向性分析数据。对于二分法疗效结局,计算相对危险度及95%置信区间(CI)。对于连续分布的结局,无法从RCT中提取数据。关于主要危害结局,所有研究仅提供了总体退出率。
检索共识别出3333篇摘要,但本综述仅纳入10项RCT,共548例患者。由于临床异质性,几乎无法进行荟萃分析。我们没有确凿证据表明抗抑郁药与抗精神病药联合使用比单独使用抗抑郁药更有效(两项RCT;RR 1.44,95%CI 0.86至2.41),但联合使用比单独使用抗精神病药更有效(三项RCT;RR 1.92,95%CI 1.32至2.80)。任何治疗组之间的总体退出率均无统计学显著差异,无论是在单个研究中还是在研究汇总后。
单独使用抗精神病药治疗不是一个好选择。对于精神病性抑郁症患者,单独开始使用抗抑郁药,若患者无反应则加用抗精神病药,或者开始就使用抗抑郁药与抗精神病药联合治疗,这两种方法似乎都是合适的选择。在临床实践中,风险与获益的平衡表明,初始抗抑郁药单药治疗,若反应不足则加用抗精神病药,对于许多患者来说应是首选的治疗策略。普遍缺乏可用数据限制了对所得结论的信心。