Suppr超能文献

双能X线吸收法分析伯明翰表面置换髋关节假体周围的应力遮挡情况。

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement.

作者信息

Harty J A, Devitt B, Harty L C, Molloy M, McGuinness A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cork University Hospital, The Mews, 61 Serpentine Ave, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Dec;125(10):693-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0059-4. Epub 2005 Oct 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Numerous reports in the literature refer to the femoral neck fracture rate in hip resurfacing. The aim of this study was to determine the bone mineral density and evidence of stress shielding around the femoral component of the Birmingham resurfacing prosthesis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with primary unilateral osteoarthritis had a Birmingham resurfacing prosthesis. DEXA analysis of the proximal femur and femoral neck was performed and compared with the opposite unaffected side.

RESULTS

Total periprosthetic bone mineral density was 0.49% greater than the control, but this did not achieve statistical significance. Although the BMD of the femoral neck was slightly increased on the prosthetic side (1.002 g/cm2) as opposed to the control side, this difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The Birmingham resurfacing prosthesis does not appear to reduce femoral neck bone mineral density in comparison to the normal femoral neck bone density. We conclude that femoral neck fractures are unlikely to be due to stress shielding related to the prosthesis.

摘要

引言

文献中有大量关于髋关节表面置换术股骨颈骨折发生率的报道。本研究的目的是确定接受伯明翰表面置换假体的患者股骨组件周围的骨密度以及应力遮挡的证据。

材料与方法

28例原发性单侧骨关节炎患者接受了伯明翰表面置换假体。对股骨近端和股骨颈进行双能X线吸收法(DEXA)分析,并与对侧未受影响的一侧进行比较。

结果

假体周围总骨密度比对照组高0.49%,但未达到统计学显著性。与对照组相比,假体侧股骨颈的骨密度虽略有增加(1.002g/cm²),但差异未达到统计学显著性。

结论

与正常股骨颈骨密度相比,伯明翰表面置换假体似乎不会降低股骨颈骨密度。我们得出结论,股骨颈骨折不太可能是由与假体相关的应力遮挡引起的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验