Wu Eric Q, Birnbaum Howard G, Mareva Milena, Tuttle Edward, Castor Adam R, Jackman Warren, Ruskin Jeremy
Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA 02119, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1693-9. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65475.
This study assesses the direct (medical and drugs) and indirect (work loss) annual costs associated with Atrial Fibrillation (AFIB) in a privately insured population.
AFIB is the most common sustained rhythm disturbance, affecting 2.3 million people in the United States.
Cost and co-morbidity measures for AFIB patients were compared to matched controls using a privately insured administrative database (including medical, drug, and disability claims) for 2 million enrollees, 1999-2002 from 16 employers across the United States. Patients with an AFIB diagnosis on at least two occasions were included in the co-morbidity analysis (n = 3944). A non-AFIB control sample was randomly selected with a 1:1 ratio, with characteristics (i.e., age, gender, health plan) matched to AFIB patients. Excess medical costs (i.e., employer payments) were estimated for AFIB patients, defined as the difference in average annual costs between AFIB and control patients (n = 3944); excess work-loss costs were defined similarly for employees with available work-loss data (n = 603). Statistical significance in the descriptive analysis was measured by paired t-tests for cost, or Chi-square tests for co-morbidity comparisons. A two-part multivariate model of excess cost was further estimated to control for co-existing conditions and other patient characteristics. The excess costs of AFIB patients were estimated as the difference between the observed costs of AFIB patients and their estimated costs, assuming they did not have AFIB.
The multivariate analysis found that the excess annual direct cost of AFIB was $12,349 (p < 0.01), with AFIB patients approximately 5 times as costly as non-AFIB individuals ($15,553 versus $3204, respectively). The excess annual total cost was $14,875 (p < 0.01), with AFIB patients again approximately 5 times as costly as non-AFIB individuals ($18,454 versus $3,579, respectively). AFIB was associated with increased incidence of atrial flutter (p < 0.01), heart failure (Relative Risk (RR) = 29, p < 0.01), other arrhythmias/conduction disorders (RR = 16, p < 0.01), heart attack (RR = 8, p < 0.01), and stroke (RR = 6, p < 0.01).
AFIB is a costly disease and one for which more definitive therapies might offer some potential for reducing, not only the clinical impact, but also the economic burden of the disease.
本研究评估了美国一个私人保险人群中与心房颤动(AFIB)相关的直接(医疗和药物)和间接(工作损失)年度成本。
AFIB是最常见的持续性心律失常,在美国影响着230万人。
使用一个涵盖200万名参保人的私人保险管理数据库(包括医疗、药物和残疾索赔),对1999 - 2002年来自美国16家雇主的AFIB患者的成本和合并症指标与匹配的对照组进行比较。至少有两次AFIB诊断的患者被纳入合并症分析(n = 3944)。以1:1的比例随机选取非AFIB对照样本,其特征(即年龄、性别、健康计划)与AFIB患者相匹配。估算AFIB患者的额外医疗成本(即雇主支付的费用),定义为AFIB患者与对照患者平均年度成本的差值(n = 3944);对于有可用工作损失数据的员工(n = 603),以类似方式定义额外的工作损失成本。描述性分析中的统计学显著性通过成本的配对t检验或合并症比较的卡方检验来衡量。进一步估计了一个两部分的多元超额成本模型,以控制共存疾病和其他患者特征。AFIB患者的超额成本估计为AFIB患者观察到的成本与其估计成本之间的差值,假设他们没有AFIB。
多变量分析发现,AFIB的年度额外直接成本为12,349美元(p < 0.01),AFIB患者的成本约为非AFIB个体的5倍(分别为15,553美元和3204美元)。年度额外总成本为14,875美元(p < 0.01),AFIB患者的成本再次约为非AFIB个体的5倍(分别为18,454美元和3,579美元)。AFIB与心房扑动(p < 0.01)、心力衰竭(相对风险(RR)= 29,p < 0.01)、其他心律失常/传导障碍(RR = 16,p < 0.01)、心脏病发作(RR = 8,p < 0.01)和中风(RR = 6,p < 0.01)的发病率增加相关。
AFIB是一种成本高昂的疾病,更有效的治疗方法不仅可能减轻该疾病的临床影响,还可能减轻其经济负担。