Cecchini Renata Cristina M, Zezell Denise Maria, de Oliveira Elisabeth, de Freitas Patricia M, Eduardo Carlos de P
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, 05508-900, Brazil.
Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Dec;37(5):366-72. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20247.
This study evaluated the effect of Er:YAG laser on enamel acid resistance.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy human enamel slabs were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 10): G1, Er:YAG laser (Key Laser 2, KaVo, Germany) 60 mJ, 2 Hz, 33.3 J/cm2 (handpiece no. 2051, non-contact); G2, Er:YAG laser 80 mJ, 2 Hz, 44.4 J/cm2 (handpiece no. 2051, non-contact); G3, Er:YAG laser 120 mJ, 2 Hz, 66.6 J/cm2 (handpiece no. 2051, non-contact); G4, Er:YAG laser 64 mJ, 2 Hz, 20 J/cm2 (handpiece no. 2055, contact); G5, Er:YAG laser 86.4 mJ, 2 Hz, 26.9 J/cm2 (handpiece no. 2055, contact); G6, Er:YAG laser 135 mJ, 2 Hz, 42.2 J/cm2 (handpiece no. 2055, contact); G7, control. After laser irradiation, samples were submitted to an acid challenge. For both the nos. 2051 and 2055 handpieces, irradiation was performed with a water cooled spray (5.0 ml/minutes). The calcium and phosphorous ions delivered from the tooth surface were quantified by atomic emission spectrometry, and morphological analysis of the enamel surface was performed under scanning electron microscopy. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple comparisons tests were applied to distinguish significant differences among the treatments (alpha = 5%).
Groups G1, G2, and G4 presented decreased demineralization. The SEM evaluation revealed different surface alterations as a result of the different energies used.
Lower energies can decrease enamel solubility without severe alterations of the enamel.
本研究评估了铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光对牙釉质抗酸性的影响。
研究设计/材料与方法:将70个人类牙釉质块随机分为7组(每组n = 10):G1组,使用德国卡瓦公司的Key Laser 2型Er:YAG激光,能量60 mJ,频率2 Hz,能量密度33.3 J/cm²(2051号非接触式手持器械);G2组,Er:YAG激光能量80 mJ,频率2 Hz,能量密度44.4 J/cm²(2051号非接触式手持器械);G3组,Er:YAG激光能量120 mJ,频率2 Hz,能量密度66.6 J/cm²(2051号非接触式手持器械);G4组,Er:YAG激光能量64 mJ,频率2 Hz,能量密度20 J/cm²(2055号接触式手持器械);G5组,Er:YAG激光能量86.4 mJ,频率2 Hz,能量密度26.9 J/cm²(2055号接触式手持器械);G6组,Er:YAG激光能量135 mJ,频率2 Hz,能量密度42.2 J/cm²(2055号接触式手持器械);G7组为对照组。激光照射后,对样本进行酸蚀挑战。对于2051号和2055号手持器械,照射时均采用水冷喷雾(5.0毫升/分钟)。通过原子发射光谱法定量测定从牙釉质表面释放的钙和磷离子,并在扫描电子显微镜下对牙釉质表面进行形态分析。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和多重比较检验来区分不同处理之间的显著差异(α = 5%)。
G1组、G2组和G4组的脱矿减少。扫描电子显微镜评估显示,由于使用的能量不同,表面出现了不同的改变。
较低能量可降低牙釉质的溶解性,而不会对牙釉质造成严重改变。