Aïssaoui Younès, Zeggwagh Amine Ali, Zekraoui Aïcha, Abidi Khalid, Abouqal Redouane
*Service de Réanimation Médicale et de Toxicologie Clinique, Hôpital Ibn Sina; and †Laboratoire de Biostatistiques, de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Rabat, Morocco.
Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1470-1476. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000182331.68722.FF.
Assessing pain in critically ill patients, particularly in nonverbal patients, is a great challenge. In this study, we validated a behavioral pain scale (BPS) in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients. The BPS score was the sum of 3 subscales that have a range score of 1-4: facial expression, upper limb movements, and compliance with mechanical ventilation. Two assessors observed and scored pain simultaneously with the BPS at rest and during painful procedures. The psychometric properties of the BPS that were studied were reliability, validity, and responsiveness. We achieved 360 observations in 30 patients. The BPS was internally reliable (Cronbach alpha = 0.72). The intraclass correlation coefficient to evaluate inter-rater reliability was high (0.95). Validity was demonstrated by the change in BPS scores, which were significantly higher during painful procedures, with averages of 3.9 +/- 1.1 at rest and 6.8 +/- 1.9 during procedures (P < 0.001), and by the principal components factor analysis, which revealed a large first-factor accounting for 65% of the variance in pain expression. The BPS exhibited excellent responsiveness, with an effect size ranging from 2.2 to 3.4. This study demonstrated that the BPS can be valid and reliable for measuring pain in noncommunicative intensive care unit patients.
评估重症患者的疼痛,尤其是非言语表达患者的疼痛,是一项巨大的挑战。在本研究中,我们在重症、镇静且接受机械通气的患者中验证了一种行为疼痛量表(BPS)。BPS评分是3个分量表得分之和,每个分量表的评分范围为1 - 4分:面部表情、上肢运动以及对机械通气的顺应性。两名评估者在患者休息时和进行疼痛操作期间,同时使用BPS对疼痛进行观察和评分。所研究的BPS的心理测量特性包括可靠性、有效性和反应性。我们对30名患者进行了360次观察。BPS具有内部可靠性(Cronbach阿尔法系数 = 0.72)。用于评估评分者间可靠性的组内相关系数很高(0.95)。BPS评分的变化证明了其有效性,在疼痛操作期间BPS评分显著更高,休息时平均分为3.9±1.1,操作期间平均分为6.8±1.9(P < 0.001),主成分因子分析也表明,第一个大因子占疼痛表达方差的65%。BPS表现出出色的反应性,效应大小范围为2.2至3.4。本研究表明,BPS在测量非交流性重症监护病房患者的疼痛方面具有有效性和可靠性。