Musgrove M T, Jones D R, Northcutt J K, Cox N A, Harrison M A
Russell Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA.
J Food Prot. 2005 Oct;68(10):2144-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-68.10.2144.
Recovery of bacteria from shell eggs is important for evaluating the efficacy of processing and the quality and safety of the final product. Shell rinse (SR) techniques are easy to perform and widely used. An alternative sampling method involves crushing and rubbing the shell (CR). To determine the most appropriate method for recovering microorganisms from shell eggs, 358 shell eggs were collected from a commercial egg processor and sampled by SR and CR techniques. Total aerobic mesophiles and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated on plate count and violet red bile glucose agar plates, respectively. Unwashed, in process, and postprocess eggs were evaluated in the study. Aerobic microorganism prevalence for eggshells sampled was similar for both methods (approximately 100%), but the log CFU per milliliter values were higher in the SR than the CR samples (3.2 and 2.2, respectively). Average Enterobacteriaceae recovery was similar for both methods (45 versus 40% for the SR and CR methods, respectively) when all eggs were considered together. This population was detected more often by SR when unwashed eggs were sampled (90 versus 56% for the SR and CR methods, respectively), equally by SR and CR for in-process eggs (30 versus 29.3% for the SR and CR methods, respectively), but more often by CR for postprocess eggs (10 versus 36% for the SR and CR methods, respectively). The SR technique was easier to perform and recovered larger numbers of aerobic organisms, particularly for unwashed eggs. However, the CR technique was more efficient for recovery of Enterobacteriaceae from postprocess eggs. Stage of shell egg processing may be an important consideration when choosing egg sampling methods.
从带壳蛋中回收细菌对于评估加工效果以及最终产品的质量和安全性至关重要。蛋壳冲洗(SR)技术操作简便且应用广泛。另一种采样方法是将蛋壳破碎并摩擦(CR)。为确定从带壳蛋中回收微生物的最合适方法,从一家商业蛋品加工厂收集了358枚带壳蛋,并采用SR和CR技术进行采样。分别在平板计数琼脂平板和紫红胆盐葡萄糖琼脂平板上对需氧中温菌总数和肠杆菌科进行计数。在本研究中对未清洗、加工过程中和加工后的鸡蛋进行了评估。两种方法对采样的蛋壳上需氧微生物的检出率相似(约100%),但SR样本中每毫升的对数CFU值高于CR样本(分别为3.2和2.2)。当将所有鸡蛋一起考虑时,两种方法的平均肠杆菌科回收率相似(SR法和CR法分别为45%和40%)。在对未清洗鸡蛋采样时,SR法更常检测到该菌属(SR法和CR法分别为90%和56%),在加工过程中的鸡蛋中,SR法和CR法检出率相同(SR法和CR法分别为30%和29.3%),但在加工后的鸡蛋中,CR法更常检测到该菌属(SR法和CR法分别为10%和36%)。SR技术操作更简便,能回收更多的需氧生物,特别是对于未清洗的鸡蛋。然而,CR技术从加工后鸡蛋中回收肠杆菌科更有效。在选择鸡蛋采样方法时,带壳蛋的加工阶段可能是一个重要的考虑因素。