Musgrove M T, Jones D R, Northcutt J K, Curtis P A, Anderson K E, Fletcher D L, Cox N A
Russell Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA.
J Food Prot. 2004 Dec;67(12):2801-4. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.12.2801.
To successfully implement a hazard analysis critical control point plan, prerequisite programs are essential. Sanitation standard operating procedures are an important part of such a plan and can reduce contamination levels so that food safety and quality are not adversely affected. Noncontact surfaces in the shell egg processing plants can serve as a reservoir of cross-contamination. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of sanitation programs used in a variety of shell egg processing facilities (in-line, off-line, and mixed operations). Fourteen different noncontact surfaces were sampled in nine commercial facilities across the southeastern United States. Non-egg-contact surfaces were defined as those where the shell egg does not come into direct contact with the surface or with the fluid from that surface. Gauze pads soaked in sterile phosphate-buffered saline were used for sampling at the end of a processing day (POST) and again the next morning prior to operations (PRE). Aerobic plate counts (APCs) and numbers of Enterobacteriaceae were determined. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between POST and PRE counts for either population recovered from the 14 sampling sites. Only samples from the floor under the farm belts, nest-run loader, washers, and packer heads were reduced by 1 log CFU/ml of rinsate for APCs or Enterobacteriaceae counts. APCs of more than 10(4) CFU/ml of rinsate were recovered from many samples. Highest APCs were found on the floor under the farm belt and on shelves of the nest-run carts. High APCs were found on the wheel surface for off-line carts and on the loading dock floor. Highest Enterobacteriaceae counts were found in samples from the floor, drain, and nest-run egg cart shelves. A lack of significant difference between POST and PRE counts indicates that current sanitation programs could be improved. These data suggest that traffic patterns for the movement of eggs and materials through the plant should be reevaluated so that cross-contamination is reduced.
要成功实施危害分析与关键控制点计划,前提方案至关重要。卫生标准操作程序是该计划的重要组成部分,可降低污染水平,从而使食品安全和质量不受不利影响。带壳蛋加工厂的非接触表面可能成为交叉污染的源头。本研究的目的是评估多种带壳蛋加工设施(在线、离线和混合操作)中使用的卫生计划的效果。在美国东南部的9个商业设施中,对14个不同的非接触表面进行了采样。非蛋接触表面定义为带壳蛋不直接接触该表面或该表面液体的那些表面。在加工日结束时(POST)以及次日早晨操作前(PRE),使用浸有无菌磷酸盐缓冲盐水的纱布垫进行采样。测定了需氧平板计数(APC)和肠杆菌科数量。从14个采样点回收的两种菌的POST计数和PRE计数之间均未发现显著差异(P>0.05)。只有来自农场传送带下方的地面、初产蛋装载机、清洗机和包装机头的样本,其APC或肠杆菌科计数的冲洗液减少了1个对数CFU/ml。许多样本的冲洗液中回收的APC超过10⁴CFU/ml。农场传送带下方的地面和初产蛋推车的架子上APC最高。离线推车的轮表面和装卸平台地面上的APC较高。地板、排水口和初产蛋推车架子的样本中肠杆菌科计数最高。POST计数和PRE计数之间缺乏显著差异表明当前的卫生计划有待改进。这些数据表明,应重新评估鸡蛋和物料在工厂内的流动路径,以减少交叉污染。