Budoff Matthew J, Nasir Khurram, Mao Songshou, Tseng Philip H, Chau Alex, Liu Sandy T, Flores Ferdinand, Blumenthal Roger S
Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, 1124 W Carson Street, Bldg RB-2, Torrance, CA, USA.
Atherosclerosis. 2006 Aug;187(2):343-50. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.09.013. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
Although cardiovascular risk factor levels are substantially different in Caucasians, African-American, Hispanics, and Asians, the relative rates of coronary heart disease in these groups are not consistent with these differences. The objective of the study is to assess the differences in the prevalence and severity of coronary artery calcification, as a measure of atherosclerosis, in these different ethnic groups.
Electron-beam tomography was performed in 16,560 asymptomatic men and women (Asians=1336, African-Americans=610, Hispanics=1256) aged >or=35 years referred by their physician for cardiovascular risk evaluation. The study population encompassed 70% males, aged 52+/-8 years.
Caucasians were more likely to present with dyslipidemia (p<0.0001), while African-Americans and Hispanics had a higher prevalence of smoking, diabetes, and hypertension (all p<0.001). After adjustment for age, gender, risk factors, and treatment for hypercholesterolemia, compared with Caucasians, the relative risks for men having coronary calcification were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.48-0.86) in African-Americans, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.67-1.15) in Hispanics, and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80) in Asians. After similar adjustments, the relative risks for women having coronary calcification, were 1.58 (95% CI: 1.13-2.19) for African-Americans, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.66-1.06) in Hispanics, and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.89) in Asian women. After adjusting for age and risk factors using multivariable analysis, African-American men were least likely to have any coronary calcium while African-American women had significantly higher OR of any calcification. Asian men and women had significantly lower OR of any calcification. There was no significant difference in prevalence or severity of atherosclerosis between Hispanics and Caucasians, in men or women.
Our study results demonstrate significant difference in the presence as well as severity of calcification according to ethnicity, independent of atherosclerotic risk factors. Results from this study (physician referred) closely parallel the results from MESA (population based, measured risk factors). Ethnic specific data on the predictive value of differing coronary calcium scores are needed.
尽管白种人、非裔美国人、西班牙裔和亚裔的心血管危险因素水平存在显著差异,但这些群体中冠心病的相对发病率与这些差异并不一致。本研究的目的是评估这些不同种族群体中冠状动脉钙化(作为动脉粥样硬化的一种衡量指标)的患病率和严重程度的差异。
对16560名年龄≥35岁、由医生转诊进行心血管风险评估的无症状男性和女性(亚洲人=1336名,非裔美国人=610名,西班牙裔=1256名)进行电子束断层扫描。研究人群中70%为男性,年龄为52±8岁。
白种人更易出现血脂异常(p<0.0001),而非裔美国人和西班牙裔的吸烟、糖尿病和高血压患病率更高(均p<0.001)。在调整年龄、性别、危险因素和高胆固醇血症治疗后,与白种人相比,非裔美国男性发生冠状动脉钙化的相对风险为0.64(95%可信区间:0.48 - 0.86),西班牙裔为0.88(95%可信区间:0.67 - 1.15),亚洲男性为0.66(95%可信区间:0.55 - 0.80)。经过类似调整后,非裔美国女性发生冠状动脉钙化的相对风险为1.58(95%可信区间:1.13 - 2.19),西班牙裔女性为0.84(95%可信区间:0.66 - 1.06),亚洲女性为0.71(95%可信区间:0.56 - 0.89)。使用多变量分析调整年龄和危险因素后,非裔美国男性发生任何冠状动脉钙化的可能性最小,而非裔美国女性发生任何钙化的比值比显著更高。亚洲男性和女性发生任何钙化的比值比显著更低。西班牙裔与白种人在男性或女性的动脉粥样硬化患病率或严重程度上没有显著差异。
我们的研究结果表明,根据种族不同,钙化的存在和严重程度存在显著差异,且独立于动脉粥样硬化危险因素。本研究(医生转诊)的结果与多民族动脉粥样硬化研究(基于人群,测量危险因素)的结果非常相似。需要不同种族特异性的关于不同冠状动脉钙化评分预测价值的数据。