Suppr超能文献

初级保健医生干预倾向的差异。

Variation in the tendency of primary care physicians to intervene.

作者信息

Sirovich Brenda E, Gottlieb Daniel J, Welch H Gilbert, Fisher Elliott S

机构信息

VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction, VT 05009, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2005 Oct 24;165(19):2252-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.19.2252.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research has documented dramatic variation in health care spending across the United States that has little relationship to health outcomes. Although high-spending areas have more physicians per capita, it is not known whether this disparity fully explains the differences in spending or whether individual physicians in high-spending regions have a greater tendency to intervene for their patients. We sought to measure the tendency of primary care physicians to intervene across regions that differ in their levels of local health care spending.

METHODS

We used data from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey, a telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of 5490 primary care physicians who provided care to adults in 1998-1999 (response rate 59%). Local health care spending in physicians' communities was determined by assigning each participating physician to 1 of 306 US hospital referral regions. The tendency of physicians to intervene was measured by evaluating their responses to 6 clinical vignettes in which they were asked how often they would order a test, referral, or treatment for the patient described.

RESULTS

In 5 of the 6 vignettes, physicians in high-spending regions were more likely to recommend interventions than those practicing in low-spending regions. For example, for a 35-year-old man with back pain and foot drop, physicians in high-spending regions would recommend magnetic resonance imaging 82% of the time, compared with 69% for physicians in low-spending regions (P<.001). For a 60-year-old man somewhat bothered by symptoms of benign prostatic hypertrophy, physicians in high-spending regions would make a urology referral 32% of the time, while those in low-spending regions would do so only 23% of the time (P<.001). Our findings that physicians in high-spending regions have a greater tendency to intervene persisted in analyses stratified by physician specialty (family/general practice vs internal medicine).

CONCLUSION

Varying rates of health care spending across the United States reflect the underlying tendency of local physicians to recommend interventions for their patients.

摘要

背景

研究表明,美国各地的医疗保健支出存在巨大差异,而这与健康结果几乎没有关系。尽管高支出地区人均医生数量更多,但尚不清楚这种差异是否能完全解释支出的不同,也不清楚高支出地区的个体医生是否更倾向于为患者进行干预。我们试图衡量初级保健医生在当地医疗保健支出水平不同的地区进行干预的倾向。

方法

我们使用了社区追踪研究医生调查的数据,这是一项对5490名初级保健医生进行的电话调查,这些医生在1998 - 1999年为成年人提供医疗服务,样本具有全国代表性(回复率59%)。通过将每位参与调查的医生分配到美国306个医院转诊地区中的1个,来确定医生所在社区的当地医疗保健支出。通过评估医生对6个临床病例的回答来衡量他们进行干预的倾向,在这些病例中,要求医生说明他们会为所描述的患者进行检查、转诊或治疗的频率。

结果

在6个病例中的5个中,高支出地区的医生比低支出地区的医生更有可能推荐进行干预。例如,对于一名患有背痛和足下垂的35岁男性,高支出地区的医生82%的情况下会推荐进行磁共振成像检查,而低支出地区的医生这一比例为69%(P <.001)。对于一名有点受良性前列腺增生症状困扰的60岁男性,高支出地区的医生32%的情况下会转诊至泌尿科,而低支出地区的医生只有23%的情况下会这样做(P <.001)。我们的研究结果表明,高支出地区的医生更倾向于进行干预,这一发现在按医生专业(家庭/全科医学与内科)分层的分析中依然存在。

结论

美国各地不同的医疗保健支出率反映了当地医生为患者推荐干预措施的潜在倾向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验