Suppr超能文献

综合虐待量表:临床环境中多维伴侣虐待测量方法的进一步发展及信效度评估

The composite abuse scale: further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings.

作者信息

Hegarty Kelsey, Bush Robert, Sheehan Mary

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Violence Vict. 2005 Oct;20(5):529-47.

Abstract

Absence of a well-validated comprehensive partner abuse questionnaire has been a major methodological issue in domestic violence research. A new multidimensional measure of partner abuse, the Composite Abuse Scale (CAS), has four dimensions: Severe Combined Abuse, Emotional Abuse, Physical Abuse, and Harassment. A general practice patient sample (N = 1,836) has been used in the development and testing of CAS. Factor analyses in this current study confirmed the four dimensions from a preliminary nurses sample study and resulted in a final scale of 30 items consisting of acts of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse. These four factors exhibited good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.85) and the corrected item-total correlations were high (> 0.5). Evidence of criterion and construct validity is presented.

摘要

缺乏经过充分验证的全面伴侣虐待调查问卷一直是家庭暴力研究中的一个主要方法学问题。一种新的伴侣虐待多维测量工具——综合虐待量表(CAS),有四个维度:严重综合虐待、情感虐待、身体虐待和骚扰。一个全科医疗患者样本(N = 1836)被用于CAS的开发和测试。本研究中的因素分析从初步的护士样本研究中证实了这四个维度,并得出了一个由30个项目组成的最终量表,这些项目包括身体、情感和性虐待行为。这四个因素表现出良好的内部信度(克朗巴哈系数> 0.85),且校正后的项目与总分相关性很高(> 0.5)。文中还给出了效标效度和结构效度的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验