Rounsaville B J, Weissman M M, Rosenberger P H, Wilber C H, Kleber H D
J Affect Disord. 1979 Dec;1(4):255-67. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(79)90012-0.
Previous investigators have reported a high prevalence of depressive symptoms in drug-dependent patients. Given the responsiveness of depressive disorders to both psychological and pharmacological treatments, it is desirable to find an economical, efficient screening instrument to detect depressive disorders in this population. In this study, 6 depression symptom screening scales (Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Depression Scale, Raskin Depression Scale, Degree of Illness Rating, Symptom Checklist 90 Overall, and Depression Subscale) based on either clinician interview or patient self report, were compared according to their utility in detecting cases of depression among 64 applicants for treatment at a substance abuse treatment unit of a community mental health center. The criteria for a case of depression were the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) which are specified and operationalized. Cases identified using previously described cutoff scores on the screening scales were compared to rates based on the RDC and sensitivity and specificity were determined. The results showed that: (1) although the sensitivity of the symptom scales was applicable, ranging from 65--94%, the specificity was less impressive, ranging from 39--61%, and (2) the Beck Depression Inventory, a 13-item patient self report was the most sensitive and specific and is recommended for screening drug-dependent populations for depression.
先前的研究人员报告称,药物依赖患者中抑郁症状的患病率很高。鉴于抑郁症对心理和药物治疗均有反应,因此需要找到一种经济、有效的筛查工具来检测该人群中的抑郁症。在本研究中,根据6种基于临床医生访谈或患者自我报告的抑郁症状筛查量表(贝克抑郁量表、汉密尔顿抑郁量表、拉斯金抑郁量表、疾病严重程度评定量表、症状自评量表90项全量表和抑郁分量表)在一家社区心理健康中心物质滥用治疗单元的64名治疗申请者中检测抑郁症病例的效用进行了比较。抑郁症病例的标准是已明确规定并可操作的研究诊断标准(RDC)。将使用先前描述的筛查量表临界值分数确定的病例率与基于RDC的率进行比较,并确定敏感性和特异性。结果表明:(1)尽管症状量表的敏感性尚可,范围在65%至94%之间,但特异性较差,范围在39%至61%之间;(2)贝克抑郁量表,一种13项的患者自我报告量表,是最敏感和特异的,建议用于筛查药物依赖人群中的抑郁症。