Singh B
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Natal, Congella, South Africa.
J Laryngol Otol. 1992 Jun;106(6):507-10. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100120006.
Whilst it is generally accepted that the standard management for anterior or benign epistaxis is either cautery or anterior nasal packing, that of posterior or intractable epistaxis remains controversial. Various modalities of treatment, ranging from posterior nasal packing to arterial ligation and embolization, have been advocated but none have been unanimously accepted as the treatment of choice. The purpose of this paper was to determine the efficacy of internal maxillary arterial ligation versus combined internal maxillary arterial ligation and anterior ethmoid arterial coagulation in intractable epistaxis. Over a six year period, from 1985 to 1990, 454 patients were admitted and treated for epistaxis. Forty-seven patients were diagnosed as having intractable epistaxis on the basis that the epistaxis failed to settle on anterior nasal packing. They were moved to the next step in management, which was combined anterior and posterior nasal packing. There were 30 failures, one was found to have choriocarcinoma of the maxilla, and was treated with cytotoxics, and the other 29 were moved to the next step, which was arterial ligation. Fifteen patients had internal maxillary arterial ligation, and 14 combined internal maxillary arterial ligation and anterior ethmoidal arterial coagulation. Large windows were created in both the anterior and posterior walls of the maxillary sinuses and all identifiable branches of the internal maxillary artery were dissected out carefully and two medium size ligating clips were placed over the main trunk, the sphenopalatine and the descending palatine branches. Single clips were placed on all other identifiable branches. Coagulation of the anterior ethmoidal artery was performed with a bipolar cautery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
虽然一般认为前位或良性鼻出血的标准治疗方法是烧灼或前鼻孔填塞,但后位或难治性鼻出血的治疗方法仍存在争议。从后鼻孔填塞到动脉结扎和栓塞等各种治疗方式都有人提倡,但没有一种被一致公认为首选治疗方法。本文的目的是确定上颌内动脉结扎术与上颌内动脉结扎术联合筛前动脉凝固术治疗难治性鼻出血的疗效。在1985年至1990年的六年期间,有454例鼻出血患者入院治疗。47例患者因前鼻孔填塞后鼻出血未得到控制而被诊断为难治性鼻出血。他们进入下一步治疗,即前后鼻孔联合填塞。其中30例治疗失败,1例被发现患有上颌绒毛膜癌,接受了细胞毒性药物治疗,另外29例进入下一步治疗,即动脉结扎。15例患者接受了上颌内动脉结扎术,14例接受了上颌内动脉结扎术联合筛前动脉凝固术。在上颌窦的前壁和后壁都开了大窗口,仔细解剖出上颌内动脉所有可识别的分支,在主干、蝶腭动脉和腭降动脉分支上放置两个中型结扎夹。在所有其他可识别的分支上放置单个夹子。用双极电凝器对筛前动脉进行凝固。(摘要截短于250字)