Arribas José R, Pulido Federico, Delgado Rafael, Lorenzo Alicia, Miralles Pilar, Arranz Alberto, González-García Juan J, Cepeda Concepción, Hervás Rafael, Paño José R, Gaya Francisco, Carcas Antonio, Montes María L, Costa José R, Peña José M
Hospital La Paz, Consulta de Medicina Interna II, Paseo de la Castellana, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005 Nov 1;40(3):280-7. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000180077.59159.f4.
This study evaluated maintenance with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy vs. continuing lopinavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleosides in HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication.
Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, pilot clinical trial.
Adult patients were eligible if they had no history of virologic failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, were receiving 2 nucleosides + lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg b.i.d.) for >1 month and had maintained serum HIV RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months prior to enrollment.
Forty-two patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue or stop the nucleosides. At baseline there were no significant differences between groups in median CD4 cells/muL (baseline or nadir), pre-HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) HIV log10 viremia, or time with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL prior to enrollment. After 48 weeks of follow-up, percentage of patients remaining at <50 HIV RNA copies/mL (intention to treat, M = F) was 81% for the monotherapy group (95% CI: 64% to 98%) vs. 95% for the triple-therapy group (95% CI: 86% to 100%); P = 0.34. Patients in whom monotherapy failed had significantly worse adherence than patients who remained virally suppressed on monotherapy. Monotherapy failures did not show primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and were successfully reinduced with prerandomization nucleosides. Mean change in CD4 cells/microL: +70 (monotherapy) and +8 (triple) (P = 0.27). Mean serum fasting lipids remained stable in both groups. No serious adverse events were observed.
Most of the patients maintained with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy remain with undetectable viral load after 48 weeks. Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy were not associated with the development of primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and could be successfully reinduced adding back prior nucleosides.
本研究评估了洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药维持治疗与继续使用洛匹那韦/利托那韦及两种核苷类药物治疗对HIV复制得到抑制的HIV感染患者的效果。
随机、对照、开放标签、多中心试点临床试验。
成年患者若符合以下条件则 eligible:接受蛋白酶抑制剂治疗时无病毒学失败史,正在接受两种核苷类药物 + 洛匹那韦/利托那韦(400/100毫克,每日两次)治疗超过1个月,且在入组前血清HIV RNA <50拷贝/毫升维持超过6个月。
42例患者按1:1随机分组,分别继续或停用核苷类药物。基线时,两组在中位CD4细胞/微升(基线或最低点)、HAART(高效抗逆转录病毒治疗)前HIV log10病毒血症或入组前HIV RNA <50拷贝/毫升的时间方面无显著差异。随访48周后,单药治疗组HIV RNA <50拷贝/毫升的患者百分比(意向性分析,男 = 女)为81%(95%可信区间:64%至98%),三联治疗组为95%(95%可信区间:86%至100%);P = 0.34。单药治疗失败的患者依从性显著低于单药治疗后病毒仍被抑制的患者。单药治疗失败的患者在蛋白酶基因中未显示出原发性耐药突变,且使用随机分组前的核苷类药物成功重新诱导病毒抑制。CD4细胞/微升的平均变化:单药治疗组为 +70,三联治疗组为 +8(P = 0.27)。两组的平均血清空腹血脂均保持稳定。未观察到严重不良事件。
大多数接受洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药维持治疗的患者在48周后病毒载量仍不可检测。洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药治疗失败与蛋白酶基因原发性耐药突变的发生无关,添加之前的核苷类药物可成功重新诱导病毒抑制。