Suppr超能文献

语义性痴呆中关于有生命、无生命及“感官性质”类别的知识。

Knowledge of living, nonliving and "sensory quality" categories in semantic dementia.

作者信息

Carroll Erin, Garrard Peter

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, UK.

出版信息

Neurocase. 2005 Oct;11(5):338-50. doi: 10.1080/13554790591006339.

Abstract

This article reports the findings from 3 patients with semantic dementia (SD) who were given a novel battery of 33 items from sensory quality categories (SQCs) as previously described by Borgo and Shallice (2001; 2003) and Laiacona, Capitani and Caramazza (2003). Their performance on three tasks (two naming, one word-to-picture matching) was compared with performance on similar tasks using a conventional semantic battery. At the group level, patients performed worse than age-matched controls overall, but neither group showed any differences in performance between domains (i.e., living, nonliving and SQCs). Individual patient analyses, however, showed contrasting profiles in the three patients. The results are discussed in terms of the SFT (Warrington & Shallice, 1984) and individual differences (Lambon-Ralph et al., 2003) accounts of category-specificity in SD.

摘要

本文报告了3例语义性痴呆(SD)患者的研究结果,这些患者接受了一组由33个项目组成的新颖测试,这些项目来自Borgo和Shallice(2001年;2003年)以及Laiacona、Capitani和Caramazza(2003年)先前描述的感官质量类别(SQC)。将他们在三项任务(两项命名、一项词图匹配)上的表现与使用传统语义测试组在类似任务上的表现进行了比较。在组水平上,患者总体表现比年龄匹配的对照组差,但两组在不同领域(即有生命的、无生命的和感官质量类别)的表现上均未显示出差异。然而,个体患者分析显示,这三名患者呈现出不同的表现特征。将根据语义特征测试(Warrington和Shallice,1984年)以及个体差异(Lambon-Ralph等人,2003年)对语义性痴呆中类别特异性的解释来讨论这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验